Skip to main content

Runergy vs Waaree - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Runergy
China Founded 2013 Tier 1
Read the Runergy review
VS
Waaree
India Founded 1990 Tier 1
Read the Waaree review
At a glance

Waaree has the broader catalog (222 vs 124 models). Runergy leads on peak efficiency at 24.10%. Runergy leans bifacial (77% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
124 222
Highest power
740 Wp 730 Wp
Best efficiency
24.1% 23.5%
Average efficiency
22.4% 18.4%
Bifacial share
77% 38%
Average warranty
29 yrs 22 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Runergy

Runergy is a global leader in solar technology, specializing in the R&D and production of high-efficiency solar cells and modules. The company is committed to innovation, quality, and providing a transparent and efficient supply chain to meet the growing global demand for clean energy. They have established production...

Founded
2013
Headquarters
Yancheng, Jiangsu Province, China
Annual capacity
23GW (module capacity), 63GW (cell capacity) GW/year
Employees
15,000
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Waaree

Waaree Energies Ltd. is a leading global energy transition company committed to delivering innovative, high-quality solar and sustainable energy solutions. Established in 1990 and headquartered in Mumbai, India, the company operates across 20+ countries with an integrated portfolio that spans solar modules, EPC...

Founded
1990
Headquarters
Mumbai, India
Annual capacity
13.3 GW/year
Employees
8500+
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Runergy Waaree
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 124 222+98
Max Power 740 W+10 W 730 W
Avg Power 579 W+208 W 371 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 24.10%+0.59 pp 23.51%
Avg Efficiency 22.42%+4.03 pp 18.39%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.298%/°C+0.064 -0.362%/°C
Bifacial Share 95 (77%)+38 pp 85 (38%)
Avg Warranty 29.1 yrs+7.4 yr 21.7 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Runergy skews to higher efficiency: 33% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Runergy offers more 600W+ panels (48% of lineup)

Runergy cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>N-type</strong> (60%)

Waaree cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (48%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Runergy is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Yancheng, Jiangsu province, founded in 2013 with an initial focus on solar cell production. The company ranked among the global top three in cell shipments for three consecutive years and has since expanded into module manufacturing, reporting a combined global cell capacity approaching 63 GW and approximately 21 GW of annual module output as of early 2025. Runergy has maintained BloombergNEF Tier 1 status for six consecutive quarters and recently opened a 2 GW module facility in Huntsville, Alabama. Waaree Energies is India's largest solar module manufacturer, founded in 1989 as a diversified industrial group and entering solar module manufacturing in 2007, with its headquarters in Mumbai. By late 2025, the company had lifted its global module capacity to 22.3 GW across sites in India and the United States and crossed the milestone of 1 GW of monthly production. Waaree is a consistent BNEF Tier 1 name and became the first Indian manufacturer to earn PV Tech's "A" bankability rating - a distinction that carries significant weight with project lenders. On institutional recognition, Waaree holds a modest but meaningful advantage.

Runergy's commercial lineup is anchored in N-type TOPCon bifacial modules, a direct outgrowth of its cell expertise. Its TOPCon cells achieve mass-production efficiencies averaging around 25 to 25.5 percent, and the company set a publicly verified world record of 26.55 percent for a full-area N-type cell, independently confirmed by Germany's ISFH institute. A PERC-based module range also serves cost-sensitive residential and smaller commercial applications. Waaree's portfolio is broader in technology terms, covering Mono PERC, N-type TOPCon, and HJT bifacial lines including the Plexus dual-glass series rated at approximately 22.9 percent module efficiency. That breadth positions Waaree across residential rooftop, commercial and industrial, and utility-scale ground-mount segments without requiring a second supplier.

For most international buyers, both manufacturers are credible Tier 1 choices and are broadly interchangeable on standard TOPCon bifacial projects. Runergy's depth in cell technology gives it a slight advantage for efficiency-focused utility developers. Waaree's non-Chinese production base reduces tariff exposure in EU and US markets, and its wider technology range adds sourcing flexibility. In practice, the deciding factor will typically be regional distributor availability and delivered cost.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-22

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Runergy A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Waaree
Manufacturers
Runergy AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Waaree
Manufacturers
Runergy AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Waaree
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 3 Runergy offers · See 24 Waaree offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.