Skip to main content

QN-SOLAR vs Runergy - solar panel manufacturer comparison

QN-SOLAR
China Founded 2014
Read the QN-SOLAR review
VS
Runergy
China Founded 2013 Tier 1
Read the Runergy review
At a glance

Runergy has the broader catalog (124 vs 0 models). Runergy leans bifacial (77% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
0 124
Highest power
0 Wp 740 Wp
Best efficiency
- 24.1%
Average efficiency
- 22.4%
Bifacial share
0% 77%
Average warranty
- 29 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
QN-SOLAR

QN-SOLAR (Qn-SOLAR PV Limited) is a China-based integrated photovoltaic manufacturer with six production bases across China, specializing in N-TOPCon solar cells and modules. The company officially launched its global business in 2022 and has expanded into upstream and downstream PV production, reaching a combined...

Founded
2014
Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Annual capacity
30-40 GW/year
Employees
5000-10000
Runergy

Runergy is a global leader in solar technology, specializing in the R&D and production of high-efficiency solar cells and modules. The company is committed to innovation, quality, and providing a transparent and efficient supply chain to meet the growing global demand for clean energy. They have established production...

Founded
2013
Headquarters
Yancheng, Jiangsu Province, China
Annual capacity
23GW (module capacity), 63GW (cell capacity) GW/year
Employees
15,000
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric QN-SOLAR Runergy
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 0 124+124
Max Power 0 W 740 W+740 W
Avg Power 0 W 579 W+579 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency - 24.10%
Avg Efficiency - 22.42%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient - -0.298%/°C
Bifacial Share 0 (0%) 95 (77%)+77 pp
Avg Warranty - 29.1 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Runergy skews to higher efficiency: 33% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Runergy offers more 600W+ panels (48% of lineup)

QN-SOLAR cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture
Runergy cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>N-type</strong> (60%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
QN-SOLAR all models
No panels from this manufacturer are in the database yet.
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

I have enough sourced information for both brands now.

QN-SOLAR is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Shanghai that launched its global PV business in 2022, giving it a much shorter operating history than most established Tier 1 players. By 2024 the company reported an annual production capacity of roughly 20 GW of PV cells and 25 GW of modules across four manufacturing bases in China, and it markets itself as an N-TOPCon specialist while also exploring perovskite technology for future generations. As of recent reporting, QN-SOLAR has confirmed several projects meeting BloombergNEF's Tier 1 criteria but has not yet secured full BNEF Tier 1 manufacturer status, meaning its bankability track record is still being built. Runergy, also Chinese and based in Jiangsu, has a longer and more established manufacturing footprint, having shipped over 65 GW of solar cells cumulatively by the end of 2023 and targeting around 63 GW of cell capacity with 23 GW of module capacity by the end of 2024. Runergy has been confirmed on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 PV Module Manufacturer list for multiple consecutive quarters and has also achieved a BB rating in the PV ModuleTech bankability report, giving it a notably stronger and better-documented institutional footprint than QN-SOLAR.

Both companies center their product lines on TOPCon (n-type Tunnel Oxide Passivated Contact) cell technology, which has become the industry-standard successor to PERC due to higher efficiency and lower degradation. QN-SOLAR's panels span roughly 395 W to 610 W, with an average efficiency near 21.4% and top models around 23.0%, and the lineup includes a substantial share of bifacial modules suited to ground-mounted and commercial installations alongside residential rooftop options. Runergy's catalog is broader, with around 98 listed panel models averaging about 22.2% efficiency and top performers reaching roughly 23.8%, reflecting a product strategy that spans residential rooftops through utility-scale ground-mount deployments, backed by its larger-scale cell manufacturing base.

For a typical buyer in 2025, Runergy is the safer default given its confirmed, multi-quarter BloombergNEF Tier 1 status and larger, more mature production scale, which translates into stronger financing acceptance for larger or utility-scale projects. QN-SOLAR is a newer entrant with competitive technical specifications and an aggressive TOPCon-focused roadmap, but its bankability credentials are still in progress, so it may suit buyers prioritizing price or efficiency on smaller residential or commercial jobs where full Tier 1 financing status is less critical.

Generated by Claude Sonnet 5 · 2026-09-23

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
QN-SOLAR A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Runergy
Manufacturers
QN-SOLAR AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Runergy
Manufacturers
QN-SOLAR AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Runergy
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 3 Runergy offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.