Skip to main content

Q-Cells vs TCL - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Q-Cells
South Korea Founded 1999 Tier 1
Read the Q-Cells review
VS
TCL
China Founded 1981
Read the TCL review
At a glance

Q-Cells has the broader catalog (89 vs 0 models). Q-Cells leans bifacial (39% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
89 0
Highest power
675 Wp 0 Wp
Best efficiency
23.2% -
Average efficiency
21.2% -
Bifacial share
39% 0%
Average warranty
27 yrs -
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Q-Cells

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...

Founded
1999
Headquarters
Seoul, South Korea
Annual capacity
11.2 GW/year
Employees
2000+
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
TCL
Founded
1981
Headquarters
Huizhou, China
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Q-Cells TCL
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 89+89 0
Max Power 675 W+675 W 0 W
Avg Power 468 W+468 W 0 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 23.20% -
Avg Efficiency 21.21% -
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.325%/°C -
Bifacial Share 35 (39%)+39 pp 0 (0%)
Avg Warranty 27.0 yrs -

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Q-Cells skews to higher efficiency: 2% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Q-Cells offers more 600W+ panels (19% of lineup)

Q-Cells cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (43%)

TCL cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture
04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
No panels from this manufacturer are in the database yet.
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Q-Cells, now operating as Hanwha Q CELLS, is headquartered in Seoul, South Korea, under the Hanwha conglomerate, which acquired the original German Q-Cells brand in 2012. The company holds BloombergNEF Tier 1 status and has built one of the most significant solar manufacturing footprints outside Asia, with facilities in Dalton and Cartersville, Georgia, collectively reaching roughly 8.4 GW of annual U.S. module capacity - making it the only company in North America to produce ingots, wafers, cells, and modules domestically. TCL Solar, operating under the TCL Zhonghuan umbrella, is a Chinese manufacturer whose parent company is one of the world's largest silicon wafer suppliers, reportedly commanding close to 30 percent of global wafer capacity. TCL Zhonghuan achieved BloombergNEF Tier 1 module status in Q3 2025, a more recent recognition than Q-Cells' long-standing bankability rating. On institutional footprint and Western-market track record, Q-Cells currently holds the stronger position.

In terms of product families, Q-Cells serves residential and light commercial buyers primarily through its Q.PEAK DUO and Q.TRON lines, with the Q.TRON G2 reaching efficiencies above 22.5 percent using TOPCon cell architecture. Its temperature coefficient, as low as -0.29 percent per degree Celsius, is a confirmed strength for hot-climate installations. TCL competes with a broader power range: its T5 Pro TOPCon modules cover utility-scale (up to 760 W) and residential (480 W) segments, while its TCL SunPower-branded back-contact line targets premium residential rooftops at efficiencies approaching 25 percent. TCL also offers a 30-year linear performance warranty, slightly longer than Q-Cells' 25-year equivalent.

For most buyers in Western residential markets in 2025, Q-Cells is the lower-risk default - it is stocked by a far wider installer network, benefits from U.S. domestic manufacturing incentives under the Inflation Reduction Act, and has a longer warranty-service track record. TCL is a compelling option for buyers who prioritize cutting-edge efficiency or utility-scale procurement at competitive price points, but its after-sales infrastructure outside Asia remains thinner.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-28

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Q-Cells A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar TCL
Manufacturers
Q-Cells AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO TCL
Manufacturers
Q-Cells AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar TCL
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 25 Q-Cells offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.