Skip to main content

Q-Cells vs Sungrow - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Q-Cells
South Korea Founded 1999 Tier 1
Read the Q-Cells review
VS
Sungrow
China Founded 1997 Tier 1
Read the Sungrow review
At a glance

Q-Cells has the broader catalog (89 vs 0 models). Q-Cells leans bifacial (39% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
89 0
Highest power
675 Wp 0 Wp
Best efficiency
23.2% -
Average efficiency
21.2% -
Bifacial share
39% 0%
Average warranty
27 yrs -
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Q-Cells

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...

Founded
1999
Headquarters
Seoul, South Korea
Annual capacity
11.2 GW/year
Employees
2000+
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Sungrow

Sungrow (Sungrow Power Supply Co., Ltd.) is the world's leading manufacturer of solar PV inverters and energy storage systems, headquartered in Hefei, Anhui, China. Founded in 1997, the company specializes in string and central inverters, wind converters, floating PV systems, and utility-scale battery storage...

Founded
1997
Headquarters
Hefei, China
Employees
15000-20000
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Q-Cells Sungrow
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 89+89 0
Max Power 675 W+675 W 0 W
Avg Power 468 W+468 W 0 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 23.20% -
Avg Efficiency 21.21% -
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.325%/°C -
Bifacial Share 35 (39%)+39 pp 0 (0%)
Avg Warranty 27.0 yrs -

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Q-Cells skews to higher efficiency: 2% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Q-Cells offers more 600W+ panels (19% of lineup)

Q-Cells cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (43%)

Sungrow cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture
04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
Sungrow all models
No panels from this manufacturer are in the database yet.
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Q-Cells, operating under Hanwha Q CELLS, traces its roots to Bitterfeld-Wolfen, Germany, where it was founded in 1999 before being acquired by South Korean conglomerate Hanwha Group in 2012. Today the company operates manufacturing across South Korea, the United States, and Germany, and is a confirmed Bloomberg Tier 1 module manufacturer. Its US footprint is particularly notable: two facilities in Georgia together represent approximately 8.4 GW of annual module capacity, which industry sources describe as the largest solar manufacturing campus in the Western Hemisphere. Sungrow was founded in Hefei, China in 1997 and built its global reputation as an inverter and energy storage company - BloombergNEF ranked it the world's number-one bankable inverter brand in 2025 with a 100% bankability rating. Sungrow has more recently entered module manufacturing, deploying N-Type TOPCon bifacial panels as part of a vertically integrated portfolio, though its solar panel business remains considerably newer and smaller in scale than its inverter division. On institutional footprint, Q-Cells carries the deeper track record specifically as a panel manufacturer.

Q-Cells product families center on the Q.ANTUM NEO line, which uses the company's proprietary passivated-contact cell architecture to reach efficiencies above 22.5%, paired with 25-year product warranties. The brand is most strongly positioned in premium residential rooftop installations in the US and Europe, though it also serves commercial and light utility projects. Sungrow's modules, built around N-Type TOPCon cells with bifacial dual-glass construction, are pitched primarily as part of an end-to-end system combining Sungrow inverters and battery storage. This makes them an appealing option for integrators who already specify Sungrow inverters for commercial or utility-scale ground-mount projects, but the panel-only track record is limited compared to established pure-play module manufacturers.

For a typical buyer in 2025 seeking a standalone panel purchase - particularly for residential or commercial rooftops in the US or Europe - Q-Cells is the more straightforward default, given its longer module-specific track record, confirmed Tier 1 status, domestic US manufacturing, and well-documented warranty performance. Sungrow panels are worth considering primarily when the buyer is already building around Sungrow inverters and wants a tightly integrated system from a single vendor.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-31

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Q-Cells A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Sungrow
Manufacturers
Q-Cells AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Sungrow
Manufacturers
Q-Cells AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Sungrow
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 25 Q-Cells offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.