Jolywood vs ZNShine - solar panel manufacturer comparison
ZNShine has the broader catalog (212 vs 128 models). Jolywood leads on peak efficiency at 23.60%. Jolywood leans bifacial (86% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
- Founded
- 2008
- Headquarters
- Taizhou, China
- Listed
- SZSE: 300393
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
ZNShine Solar is a high-tech PV enterprise specializing in R&D, manufacturing, and sales of solar modules. They also provide integrated photovoltaic, battery storage, and green hydrogen solutions, as well as BIPV, rooftop solar, and utility-scale solar solutions with a commitment to boosting green electricity...
- Founded
- 1988
- Headquarters
- Suqian, China
- Annual capacity
- 10 GW/year
- Employees
- 1,200
- Listed
- NEEQ: 838463
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
Jolywood skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+
Jolywood offers more 600W+ panels (38% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: TOPCon (95%)
Dominant cell tech: PERC (63%)
The flagships
Written summary
Jolywood is a Chinese solar manufacturer based in Jiangsu province, founded in 2008 and widely credited as the first company to bring N-type TOPCon cells into mass production, a milestone achieved by its Taizhou subsidiary in 2016. The company holds BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankable status and has built cell production capacity of close to 20 GW, with module output capacity of around 10 GW per year. Its third-party recognition is extensive - two PV Magazine Awards, consistent PVEL Top Performer status across multiple scorecard categories, EUPD Top Brand designation, and a TUV Rheinland quality award. ZNShine (ZNSHINE PV-TECH Co., Ltd.) traces its industrial roots to 1988, entering the photovoltaic business in 2006, which makes it one of the longer-established participants in the sector. It has held BloombergNEF Tier 1 status without interruption since 2015 and operates three production bases in China - Changzhou, Suqian, and Dali - with combined module capacity estimated at approximately 10 GW. ZNShine received a B rating in PV Tech's bankability ranking and has partnered with Munich Re for PV warranty insurance, a feature that resonates with risk-averse project finance teams. On institutional footprint, Jolywood carries a broader portfolio of independent validations, while ZNShine's longer Tier 1 tenure gives it a track record advantage with conservative lenders.
Jolywood's product range is built around two N-type cell architectures: TOPCon and HJT. Its TOPCon cells set a certified world efficiency record of 26.7% in 2023, and module-level efficiencies of up to 23.2% have been independently confirmed. These attributes make Jolywood panels a strong fit for space-constrained residential rooftops, commercial and industrial installations where watts per square metre matter, and utility-scale ground-mount projects where bifacial gain and low long-term degradation are priorities. ZNShine offers a broader product mix spanning traditional monocrystalline formats through to N-type TOPCon bifacial modules rated at up to 22.5% efficiency, backed by a 12-year product warranty and 25- or 30-year performance guarantees depending on glass configuration.
For most international buyers, Jolywood is the stronger default when cutting-edge cell technology, a clear N-type product roadmap, and a heavyweight certification record are the deciding factors. ZNShine is a credible Tier 1 alternative - particularly appealing when Munich Re warranty backing, multi-technology supply flexibility, or a long unbroken bankability history carry more weight than technology differentiation. The two brands are not fully interchangeable given Jolywood's clearer innovation leadership, but for standard commercial projects where Tier 1 status is the minimum bar, both qualify without significant risk differential.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-01
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 24 Jolywood offers · See 9 ZNShine offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.