Skip to main content

Jinko Solar vs Neo Solar Power - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Jinko Solar
China Founded 2006 Tier 1
Read the Jinko Solar review
VS
Neo Solar Power
Taiwan Founded 2005
Read the Neo Solar Power review
At a glance

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 30 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Neo Solar Power leans bifacial (67% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
637 30
Highest power
735 Wp 715 Wp
Best efficiency
24.8% 23.0%
Average efficiency
22.2% 21.8%
Bifacial share
36% 67%
Average warranty
29 yrs 28 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Jinko Solar

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

Founded
2006
Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Annual capacity
130.0 GW/year
Employees
33,830
Listed
NYSE: JKS
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Neo Solar Power
Founded
2005
Headquarters
Hsinchu, Taiwan
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Jinko Solar Neo Solar Power
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 637+607 30
Max Power 735 W+20 W 715 W
Avg Power 523 W 535 W+12 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 24.80%+1.77 pp 23.03%
Avg Efficiency 22.18%+0.39 pp 21.79%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.304%/°C+0.016 -0.320%/°C
Bifacial Share 231 (36%) 20 (67%)+30 pp
Avg Warranty 28.7 yrs+1.2 yr 27.5 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Neo Solar Power offers more 600W+ panels (33% of lineup)

Jinko Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (41%)

Neo Solar Power cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (67%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Jinko Solar and Neo Solar Power are both Asia-based photovoltaic manufacturers, but they diverge sharply in scale, market reach, and financial standing. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 in China and listed on the New York Stock Exchange, has grown into the world's largest solar module manufacturer, with a stated production capacity of 130 GW and a workforce exceeding 33,800 employees. It holds Tier 1 bankable status, confirming its financial credibility with lenders and project finance institutions globally. Neo Solar Power, founded one year earlier in 2005 in Taiwan, is a considerably smaller and more regionally focused player - it does not hold Tier 1 status and its current product catalog comprises just 30 panel models, compared to Jinko's 545. Originally among the top ten global solar cell producers by capacity, NSP has since merged into United Renewable Energy Co. but continues to market its own branded modules. Jinko's NYSE listing and consistent PVEL Top Performer recognition over more than a decade further reinforce its position as a tier-one global supplier, while NSP operates with a lower public profile and more limited independent performance validation.

Both manufacturers center their portfolios on TOPCon cell technology, though Neo Solar Power has a significantly higher share of TOPCon in its lineup - 66.7% versus 39.4% for Jinko. NSP also carries a much higher proportion of bifacial panels at 66.7%, compared to Jinko's 31.9%, making its catalog particularly well suited to ground-mount installations where rear-side irradiance contributes to energy yield. Jinko leads on peak module efficiency at 24.8% versus NSP's 23.03%, and its average temperature coefficient of -0.308%/°C is marginally better than NSP's -0.320%/°C, an advantage in high-temperature climates. In practical terms, Jinko's breadth of portfolio - with modules reaching 735 Wp and an average product warranty of 28.5 years - positions it well across residential rooftop installs, utility-scale ground-mount projects, and commercial C&I applications worldwide. NSP's bifacial-heavy, TOPCon-forward lineup is more narrowly optimized for open-field installations where two-sided energy capture is a design priority.

For international buyers selecting between the two, Jinko Solar is the lower-risk choice across virtually all project types - its Tier 1 bankable status, NYSE listing, and cumulative global installed base exceeding 300 GW provide strong assurance of long-term supply continuity and product support. Neo Solar Power may appeal to buyers in specific markets with established NSP distribution who prioritize a bifacial-dominant TOPCon portfolio, but the absence of Tier 1 status is a meaningful constraint whenever bank or institutional project financing is involved. Buyers should verify current regional product availability and warranty service terms before committing to either brand.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-12

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Neo Solar Power
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Neo Solar Power
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Neo Solar Power
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 171 Jinko Solar offers · See 3 Neo Solar Power offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.