Skip to main content

Jinko Solar vs LEDVANCE - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Jinko Solar
China Founded 2006 Tier 1
Read the Jinko Solar review
VS
LEDVANCE
Germany Founded 2016
Read the LEDVANCE review
At a glance

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 124 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. LEDVANCE leans bifacial (62% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
637 124
Highest power
735 Wp 705 Wp
Best efficiency
24.8% 23.4%
Average efficiency
22.2% 21.6%
Bifacial share
36% 62%
Average warranty
29 yrs 28 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Jinko Solar

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

Founded
2006
Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Annual capacity
130.0 GW/year
Employees
33,830
Listed
NYSE: JKS
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
LEDVANCE
Founded
2016
Headquarters
Garching bei München, Germany
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Jinko Solar LEDVANCE
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 637+513 124
Max Power 735 W+30 W 705 W
Avg Power 523 W+5 W 518 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 24.80%+1.40 pp 23.40%
Avg Efficiency 22.18%+0.60 pp 21.58%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.304%/°C+0.009 -0.313%/°C
Bifacial Share 231 (36%) 77 (62%)+26 pp
Avg Warranty 28.7 yrs+0.3 yr 28.4 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)

Jinko Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (41%)

LEDVANCE cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (48%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Jinko Solar is one of the world's largest solar module manufacturers, founded in 2006 in China and listed on the New York Stock Exchange. With an annual production capacity of 130 GW and a workforce of over 33,800 employees, the company holds confirmed Tier 1 bankable status - an essential credential for project financing and insurance. Its portfolio spans 545 panels, with maximum output reaching 735 Wp, average efficiency of 22.0%, and a peak efficiency of 24.8%. LEDVANCE, by contrast, is a German-headquartered brand founded in 2016 as a spin-off from Osram, now owned by Chinese lighting conglomerate MLS. The company entered the photovoltaic market around 2023-2024 and does not hold Tier 1 bankable status, reflecting its much shorter track record in solar manufacturing. Its portfolio of 124 panels tops out at 705 Wp with a maximum efficiency of 23.4% and an average of 21.6%.

Jinko Solar's technology portfolio is led by N-type TOPCon cells, which account for 39.4% of its range and represent the current industry-leading cell generation in terms of efficiency and degradation performance. Eleven consecutive years as a PVEL Top Performer and over 300 GW of cumulative global installations make Jinko a compelling choice for utility-scale ground-mount projects, large commercial and industrial (C&I) installations, and residential rooftop systems where bankability and long-term reliability are non-negotiable. LEDVANCE's portfolio is currently dominated by PERC technology (48.4% of the range), a mature but increasingly outpaced standard relative to TOPCon. However, LEDVANCE offers a notably higher share of bifacial panels - 62.1% versus 31.9% for Jinko - which may appeal to installers seeking bifacial options across residential and light commercial segments. Both manufacturers offer comparable average warranty terms of approximately 28 years.

For international buyers working on bankable projects that require institutional financing or insurance, Jinko Solar is the clear frontrunner, backed by global supply chain depth, proven quality consistency, and industry-recognized Tier 1 credentials. LEDVANCE may suit smaller residential or retail installations in European markets where the brand's lighting heritage provides some consumer familiarity, but prospective buyers should carefully verify the availability of independent warranty service and after-sales support in their region before committing to larger deployments.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-09

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar LEDVANCE
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO LEDVANCE
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar LEDVANCE
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 171 Jinko Solar offers · See 5 LEDVANCE offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.