Skip to main content

JA Solar vs Zonergy - solar panel manufacturer comparison

JA Solar
China Founded 2005 Tier 1
Read the JA Solar review
VS
Zonergy
China Founded 2007
Read the Zonergy review
At a glance

JA Solar has the broader catalog (504 vs 5 models). JA Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. JA Solar leans bifacial (47% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
504 5
Highest power
740 Wp 460 Wp
Best efficiency
24.8% 21.2%
Average efficiency
21.1% 20.7%
Bifacial share
47% 0%
Average warranty
28 yrs 25 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
JA Solar

JA Solar is a global leader in the manufacturing of high-performance photovoltaic products. Founded in 2005, the company designs, develops, manufactures, and sells solar cells and modules. JA Solar's products are used in ground-mounted power plants, commercial & industrial rooftop PV systems, and residential rooftop...

Founded
2005
Headquarters
Beijing, China
Annual capacity
100+ GW/year
Employees
37,289
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Zonergy

Zonergy is a world-renowned enterprise specializing in smart microgrid integrated solutions. The company is committed to providing first-class smart micro-grid solutions for global customers, covering technology research and development, product production, sales and trade, engineering design and implementation, and...

Founded
2007
Headquarters
Zigong, Sichuan, China
Annual capacity
null GW/year
Employees
201-300
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric JA Solar Zonergy
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 504+499 5
Max Power 740 W+280 W 460 W
Avg Power 456 W+6 W 450 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 24.80%+3.64 pp 21.16%
Avg Efficiency 21.13%+0.43 pp 20.70%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.322%/°C+0.028 -0.350%/°C
Bifacial Share 238 (47%)+47 pp 0 (0%)
Avg Warranty 27.9 yrs+2.9 yr 25.0 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

JA Solar skews to higher efficiency: 15% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

JA Solar offers more 600W+ panels (14% of lineup)

JA Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (49%)

Zonergy cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (100%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

JA Solar and Zonergy are both Chinese photovoltaic module manufacturers, but they occupy fundamentally different positions in the global solar market. JA Solar was founded in 2005, employs over 37,000 people, and has built a manufacturing capacity exceeding 100 GW - a scale that placed it joint first in Wood Mackenzie's Global Solar Module Manufacturer Ranking for H1 2025. The company holds Tier 1 bankable status according to Bloomberg NEF and is listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, with a portfolio of 524 panel models serving markets across Europe, Asia, and the Americas. Zonergy, founded in 2007, is a considerably smaller operation with only 201 to 300 employees and no publicly disclosed production capacity. It does not carry Tier 1 bankable status, and its current product catalog consists of just 5 panel models. While Zonergy has demonstrated project execution capability - notably a 300 MW IPP installation in Pakistan - its global commercial footprint remains limited and largely project-specific.

Technology-wise, JA Solar offers a broad and diverse portfolio with panels reaching a maximum output of 740 Wp and a peak efficiency of 24.4%. Nearly 44% of its lineup consists of bifacial modules, making it well suited to utility-scale ground-mount and commercial C&I projects where rear-side gain is a key yield driver. PERC technology accounts for roughly 52% of the portfolio, with the remainder including TOPCon and higher-tier cell types. The average temperature coefficient of Pmax sits at -0.32%/°C, and the average warranty term across the portfolio exceeds 27 years - both strong indicators for long-term asset performance. JA Solar is a strong fit for residential rooftop installations, large-scale commercial projects, and utility-scale deployments where bankability and long-term warranties are prerequisites for project financing. Zonergy's portfolio is entirely PERC-based, with a maximum output of 460 Wp and a peak efficiency of 21.16%. No bifacial modules are offered, the average warranty stands at 25 years, and the average temperature coefficient of Pmax is -0.35%/°C - slightly less favorable than JA Solar's across each dimension.

For international buyers comparing the two, JA Solar is the clear choice in any scenario where bankability, project financing, insurance coverage, or long-term supply security is a factor. Its top-ranked industry position, extensive product range, and verified manufacturing scale make it suitable for virtually any project type or size. Zonergy may remain competitive on price in smaller or budget-driven installations in emerging markets, but the limited portfolio depth, absence of Tier 1 status, and lack of transparent capacity data represent material risks for buyers who need reliable, long-term module supply guarantees.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-13

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
JA Solar A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Zonergy
Manufacturers
JA Solar AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Zonergy
Manufacturers
JA Solar AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Zonergy
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 348 JA Solar offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.