Skip to main content

JA Solar vs Top Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison

JA Solar
China Founded 2005 Tier 1
Read the JA Solar review
VS
Top Solar
China
Read the Top Solar review
At a glance

JA Solar has the broader catalog (504 vs 1 models). JA Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. JA Solar leans bifacial (47% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
504 1
Highest power
740 Wp 150 Wp
Best efficiency
24.8% 18.6%
Average efficiency
21.1% 18.6%
Bifacial share
47% 0%
Average warranty
28 yrs -
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
JA Solar

JA Solar is a global leader in the manufacturing of high-performance photovoltaic products. Founded in 2005, the company designs, develops, manufactures, and sells solar cells and modules. JA Solar's products are used in ground-mounted power plants, commercial & industrial rooftop PV systems, and residential rooftop...

Founded
2005
Headquarters
Beijing, China
Annual capacity
100+ GW/year
Employees
37,289
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Top Solar

Shenzhen Top Solar Energy Co., Ltd. is a Chinese solar panel manufacturer specializing in monocrystalline, flexible, folding, and portable solar panels, as well as off-grid and on-grid solar power systems. The company has its own R&D teams and production lines, serving customers across the US, Europe, Japan, the...

Headquarters
Shenzhen, China
Annual capacity
<1 GW/year
Employees
200+
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric JA Solar Top Solar
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 504+503 1
Max Power 740 W+590 W 150 W
Avg Power 456 W+306 W 150 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 24.80%+6.20 pp 18.60%
Avg Efficiency 21.13%+2.53 pp 18.60%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.322%/°C+0.098 -0.420%/°C
Bifacial Share 238 (47%)+47 pp 0 (0%)
Avg Warranty 27.9 yrs -

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

JA Solar skews to higher efficiency: 15% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

JA Solar offers more 600W+ panels (14% of lineup)

JA Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (49%)

Top Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>Back Contact</strong> (100%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

JA Solar and Top Solar are both Chinese photovoltaic module manufacturers, but they occupy vastly different positions in the global market. JA Solar was founded in 2005, employs over 37,000 people, and operates a manufacturing capacity exceeding 100 GW per year, placing it consistently among the top global module suppliers by shipment volume. The company is publicly listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange (SZSE) and holds Tier 1 bankable status as recognized by S&P Global Commodity Insights - a critical credential for project financing in utility-scale and commercial segments. JA Solar has an established presence across European markets, including Poland, and its modules are routinely accepted by banks and institutional investors in project finance transactions. Top Solar, by contrast, is a small manufacturer with over 200 employees and a production capacity below 1 GW, with only a single panel model represented in available industry databases. No founding year, Tier 1 recognition, or warranty data is publicly confirmed for Top Solar.

JA Solar's portfolio spans 524 panel models covering PERC (52% of the lineup), TOPCon, HJT, and other cell technologies, with a maximum output of 740 Wp and a peak efficiency of 24.4%. The average efficiency across its portfolio stands at approximately 20.9%, and the average temperature coefficient of Pmax is -0.32%/°C - a moderate value that supports reliable performance across climates. Nearly 44% of its lineup consists of bifacial modules, making the brand well-suited for utility-scale ground-mount projects where rear-side gain materially improves yield. An average warranty of close to 28 years further strengthens the value proposition for long-term residential rooftop and commercial C&I installations. Top Solar's single available panel is a 150 Wp Back Contact module with an efficiency of 18.6% and a temperature coefficient of -0.42%/°C. That specification points to a narrow niche focus - possibly space-constrained or specialty low-current applications - rather than mainstream residential or commercial deployment.

For international buyers comparing these two manufacturers, JA Solar is the clear choice for the vast majority of project types. Its Tier 1 bankability, extensive and diversified portfolio, strong warranty terms, and proven track record in European markets significantly reduce counterparty and performance risk. Top Solar may serve a very specific role where its Back Contact technology or compact module format is the precise requirement, but its limited single-model portfolio, small production scale, and absence of Tier 1 status make it a high-risk option for any mainstream procurement decision.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-13

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
JA Solar A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Top Solar
Manufacturers
JA Solar AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Top Solar
Manufacturers
JA Solar AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Top Solar
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 386 JA Solar offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.