Skip to main content

JA Solar vs Silfab - solar panel manufacturer comparison

JA Solar
China Founded 2005 Tier 1
Read the JA Solar review
VS
Silfab
Canada Founded 2010 Tier 1
Read the Silfab review
At a glance

JA Solar has the broader catalog (504 vs 47 models). JA Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. JA Solar leans bifacial (47% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
504 47
Highest power
740 Wp 640 Wp
Best efficiency
24.8% 22.9%
Average efficiency
21.1% 20.6%
Bifacial share
47% 30%
Average warranty
28 yrs 30 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
JA Solar

JA Solar is a global leader in the manufacturing of high-performance photovoltaic products. Founded in 2005, the company designs, develops, manufactures, and sells solar cells and modules. JA Solar's products are used in ground-mounted power plants, commercial & industrial rooftop PV systems, and residential rooftop...

Founded
2005
Headquarters
Beijing, China
Annual capacity
100+ GW/year
Employees
37,289
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Silfab

Silfab Solar is a North American leader in the design, development, and manufacture of high-efficiency, premium-quality solar cells and modules. Leveraging over 40 years of solar experience, they operate fully automated facilities in Washington, South Carolina, and Ontario, Canada. Their products are designed and...

Founded
2010
Headquarters
Mississauga, Canada
Annual capacity
1.6 GW/year
Employees
800+
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric JA Solar Silfab
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 504+457 47
Max Power 740 W+100 W 640 W
Avg Power 456 W+27 W 429 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 24.80%+1.88 pp 22.92%
Avg Efficiency 21.13%+0.57 pp 20.56%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.322%/°C+0.020 -0.341%/°C
Bifacial Share 238 (47%)+17 pp 14 (30%)
Avg Warranty 27.9 yrs 30.0 yrs+2.1 yr

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

JA Solar skews to higher efficiency: 15% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

JA Solar offers more 600W+ panels (14% of lineup)

JA Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (49%)

Silfab cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (45%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

JA Solar and Silfab represent two very different tiers of the global solar PV manufacturing landscape. JA Solar was founded in 2005 in China, is listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, and has grown into one of the world's top module producers - according to Wood Mackenzie's H1 2025 Global Solar Module Manufacturer Ranking, it jointly topped the global list alongside Trinasolar. With a production capacity exceeding 100 GW, a workforce of over 37,000 employees, and a product portfolio of 524 panel models, JA Solar operates at a scale few competitors can match. Silfab, by contrast, was founded in 2010 in Canada and has positioned itself as the leading solar module manufacturer in North America, operating facilities in Ontario and Bellingham, Washington. With a production capacity of 1.6 GW and a focused lineup of 14 models, Silfab targets the premium residential and commercial segment of the North American market. Both manufacturers hold Tier 1 bankable status, confirming their financial stability and manufacturing consistency for project finance purposes.

On the technology side, JA Solar's portfolio is broad but still predominantly PERC-based (over 52% of models), with its newer Deep Blue series incorporating TOPCon cells and bifacial designs. Its maximum panel output reaches 740 Wp with peak efficiency of 24.4%, while average efficiency across the full range sits at 20.9%. Silfab's narrower lineup leans heavily into N-type technology (over 71% of models), yielding a higher average efficiency of 21.7%, a slightly better average temperature coefficient of -0.31% per degree Celsius, and a full 30-year linear power warranty as standard. For utility-scale and large ground-mount projects, JA Solar's scale, pricing competitiveness, and broad module selection make it a natural fit. Silfab's domestic manufacturing credentials - including Buy American Act certification and a track record with U.S. federal and military installations - make it the preferred choice for U.S. public procurement and residential installers who prioritize local sourcing.

For international buyers choosing between the two, the decision largely hinges on geography and priorities. Installers and developers in Europe, Asia-Pacific, or emerging markets will find JA Solar far more accessible through established distribution networks, with a competitive price-to-performance ratio that suits everything from residential rooftop to utility-scale. Buyers in North America - particularly those working under domestic content requirements or seeking a premium brand with strong local support - will find Silfab a credible and well-warranted alternative, even if its production scale limits volume pricing advantages compared to the Chinese giants.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-13

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
JA Solar A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Silfab
Manufacturers
JA Solar AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Silfab
Manufacturers
JA Solar AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Silfab
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 333 JA Solar offers · See 2 Silfab offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.