Skip to main content

JA Solar vs Kensol - solar panel manufacturer comparison

JA Solar
China Founded 2005 Tier 1
Read the JA Solar review
VS
Kensol
Poland Founded 2014
Read the Kensol review
At a glance

JA Solar has the broader catalog (504 vs 21 models). JA Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Kensol leans bifacial (81% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
504 21
Highest power
740 Wp 460 Wp
Best efficiency
24.8% 23.0%
Average efficiency
21.1% 22.0%
Bifacial share
47% 81%
Average warranty
28 yrs 29 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
JA Solar

JA Solar is a global leader in the manufacturing of high-performance photovoltaic products. Founded in 2005, the company designs, develops, manufactures, and sells solar cells and modules. JA Solar's products are used in ground-mounted power plants, commercial & industrial rooftop PV systems, and residential rooftop...

Founded
2005
Headquarters
Beijing, China
Annual capacity
100+ GW/year
Employees
37,289
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Kensol

Kensol is a Polish company founded in 2014 that focuses on providing innovative, ecological, and economical solutions for the renewable energy sector. They design equipment tailored to the needs of the Polish market, specializing in photovoltaic (PV) and heating (HVAC) systems. Kensol offers modern and integrated...

Founded
2014
Headquarters
Gliwice, Poland
Annual capacity
null GW/year
Employees
null
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric JA Solar Kensol
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 504+483 21
Max Power 740 W+280 W 460 W
Avg Power 456 W+19 W 437 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 24.80%+1.80 pp 23.00%
Avg Efficiency 21.13% 22.04%+0.91 pp
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.322%/°C -0.296%/°C+0.026
Bifacial Share 238 (47%) 17 (81%)+34 pp
Avg Warranty 27.9 yrs 29.0 yrs+1.2 yr

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

JA Solar skews to higher efficiency: 15% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

JA Solar offers more 600W+ panels (14% of lineup)

JA Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (49%)

Kensol cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>N-type</strong> (29%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

JA Solar and Kensol represent two very different points on the solar manufacturing spectrum. JA Solar, founded in 2005 and headquartered in China, has grown into one of the world's largest PV module producers, with a workforce exceeding 37,000 employees and a stated production capacity of over 100 GW. The company holds Tier 1 bankable status from both S&P Global Commodity Insights and Bloomberg, is listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, and distributes products to more than 135 countries. Its portfolio spans 524 panel models, with PERC technology accounting for over 52% of offerings, while newer TOPCon lines such as the DeepBlue 4.0 Pro and 5.0 push maximum efficiency to 24.4% and maximum power to 740 Wp. Kensol, founded in 2014 and based in Gliwice, Poland, is a much smaller regional player with 21 panel models, a maximum output of 460 Wp, and no publicly disclosed production capacity or employee figures. It does not appear on major Tier 1 bankability lists.

On a technical level, Kensol's compact portfolio competes well in several key metrics. Its average module efficiency of 22.04% exceeds JA Solar's portfolio average of 20.87%, and its average temperature coefficient of Pmax at -0.296%/°C is more favorable than JA Solar's -0.323%/°C - meaning Kensol modules retain more rated output during high-temperature conditions, which is relevant for residential rooftop installs. Kensol also fields a notably high bifacial share of approximately 81% of its lineup compared to 44% for JA Solar, and offers a slightly longer average warranty of 29 years versus 27.85 years. As a European manufacturer, Kensol is insulated from import tariff risk that can affect Chinese suppliers, making it a pragmatic choice for EU-market buyers seeking supply chain resilience in residential and light commercial C&I segments. JA Solar's core advantage lies in its massive portfolio breadth, certified bankability, and demonstrated suitability for utility-scale ground-mount and large C&I projects where volume supply, financial guarantees, and long-term manufacturer stability are non-negotiable.

For buyers choosing between the two, the decision hinges on project scale and financing requirements. JA Solar is the lower-risk option for any bank-financed or large-scale deployment, backed by its Tier 1 status and consistent PVEL Top Performer recognition. Kensol suits smaller residential and commercial buyers in Poland and the broader EU who prioritize a European supply chain, strong bifacial coverage, and competitive average efficiency - provided they are comfortable with a less-established financial backstop behind the warranty.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-12

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
JA Solar A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Kensol
Manufacturers
JA Solar AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Kensol
Manufacturers
JA Solar AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Kensol
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 386 JA Solar offers · See 3 Kensol offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.