JA Solar vs KDM Kingdom Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison
JA Solar has the broader catalog (504 vs 3 models). JA Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. JA Solar leans bifacial (47% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
JA Solar is a global leader in the manufacturing of high-performance photovoltaic products. Founded in 2005, the company designs, develops, manufactures, and sells solar cells and modules. JA Solar's products are used in ground-mounted power plants, commercial & industrial rooftop PV systems, and residential rooftop...
- Founded
- 2005
- Headquarters
- Beijing, China
- Annual capacity
- 100+ GW/year
- Employees
- 37,289
- Listed
- SZSE: 002459
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
KDM Kingdom Solar is a Chinese solar module manufacturer based in Hefei, Anhui Province. The company specializes in manufacturing monocrystalline solar panels for global markets.
- Founded
- 2010
- Headquarters
- Hefei, China
- Annual capacity
- 1 GW/year
- Employees
- 100
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
JA Solar skews to higher efficiency: 15% of lineup is 23%+
JA Solar offers more 600W+ panels (14% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (49%)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>N-type</strong> (100%)
The flagships
Written summary
JA Solar and KDM Kingdom Solar are both China-based photovoltaic module manufacturers, but they occupy very different positions in the global market. JA Solar was founded in 2005 and has grown into one of the world's top-ranked module suppliers, with a production capacity exceeding 100 GW annually, a workforce of over 37,000 employees, and a listing on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange (SZSE). The company holds Tier 1 bankable status as recognized by S&P Global Commodity Insights, confirming its financial credibility and suitability for project-financed solar developments. It ranked 2nd globally in module shipments and achieved Top Performer status in PVEL reliability testing for the tenth time in 2025. KDM Kingdom Solar, founded in 2010, is a much smaller manufacturer with approximately 1 GW of annual production capacity and around 100 employees. It does not hold Tier 1 bankable status, and its publicly listed product catalog consists of only 3 panel models. Despite its smaller scale, the company exports its KDM-brand modules to over 100 countries according to its own claims.
On the technology side, JA Solar offers a broad and diverse portfolio of 524 panel models, with PERC cells representing the majority (over 52%) of its lineup alongside growing N-type TOPCon offerings. Its maximum panel power reaches 740 Wp, average efficiency sits at approximately 20.9%, and bifacial modules make up around 44% of the portfolio - making JA Solar well suited for utility-scale ground-mount projects, large commercial C&I installations, and residential rooftop installs where financing is involved and component bankability matters. KDM Kingdom Solar, by contrast, offers a narrow but technologically focused range: all three of its cataloged models use N-type cell technology, resulting in a notably higher average module efficiency of approximately 22.5%, a favorable temperature coefficient of -0.29%/°C Pmax, and a 30-year product warranty. No bifacial modules are offered. This positions KDM as a potential option for space-constrained residential rooftop installations where high energy density is prioritized.
For international buyers and project developers choosing between these two manufacturers, JA Solar is the clear choice for any project requiring bankable, financeable components - particularly utility-scale, C&I, or institutionally financed residential projects. KDM Kingdom Solar may appeal to buyers seeking N-type technology at a potentially lower price point for smaller residential applications, but the very limited portfolio, absence of Tier 1 status, and small company scale introduce meaningful supply chain and warranty risk that buyers should carefully evaluate before committing to a long-term procurement relationship.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-13
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 391 JA Solar offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.