Skip to main content

HY SOLAR vs Q-Cells - solar panel manufacturer comparison

HY SOLAR
Headquarters not published
Read the HY SOLAR review
VS
Q-Cells
South Korea Founded 1999 Tier 1
Read the Q-Cells review
At a glance

HY SOLAR has the broader catalog (91 vs 89 models). HY SOLAR leads on peak efficiency at 23.80%. HY SOLAR leans bifacial (100% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
91 89
Highest power
730 Wp 675 Wp
Best efficiency
23.8% 23.2%
Average efficiency
22.9% 21.2%
Bifacial share
100% 39%
Average warranty
30 yrs 27 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Q-Cells

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...

Founded
1999
Headquarters
Seoul, South Korea
Annual capacity
11.2 GW/year
Employees
2000+
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric HY SOLAR Q-Cells
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 91+2 89
Max Power 730 W+55 W 675 W
Avg Power 571 W+103 W 468 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 23.80%+0.60 pp 23.20%
Avg Efficiency 22.94%+1.73 pp 21.21%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.290%/°C+0.035 -0.325%/°C
Bifacial Share 91 (100%)+61 pp 35 (39%)
Avg Warranty 30.0 yrs+3.0 yr 27.0 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

HY SOLAR skews to higher efficiency: 54% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

HY SOLAR offers more 600W+ panels (51% of lineup)

HY SOLAR cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (100%)

Q-Cells cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (43%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

HY SOLAR is a Chinese integrated PV manufacturer founded in 2002 and headquartered in Wuxi, Jiangsu. Listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange since 2018, the company operates a vertically integrated supply chain spanning polysilicon, wafers, cells, and finished modules, with reported nameplate module capacity of approximately 26 GW. HY SOLAR has been recognized in the Global New Energy 500 and the Hurun China Top 100 Private Energy Companies, but does not appear prominently in BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability rankings based on available public sources. Q-Cells, now operating as Qcells under South Korean conglomerate Hanwha Group, traces its roots to a German founding in 1999 and has become one of the most recognized module brands in Western markets, with module production capacity of approximately 12 GW and confirmed BloombergNEF Top Tier bankability status. Qcells was additionally named an S&P Global 2025 Tier 1 Cleantech Company. On institutional footprint, Qcells holds a clear advantage with financiers and developers in North America and Europe.

HY SOLAR's catalog targets utility-scale and commercial segments, leveraging vertical integration from silicon production to finished modules to compete on cost in volume-driven tenders. Its global brand visibility outside China and certain export markets remains limited. Qcells, by contrast, has built its name primarily in premium residential rooftop installations across the United States, Europe, and Australia, while also serving commercial and utility projects. Its Q.ANTUM cell architecture, a passivated rear-contact technology building on PERC principles, defined the brand for years, and the current Q.TRON series adopts N-type TOPCon cells with efficiency ratings reaching up to 22.5%, backed by 25-year product warranties and strong degradation guarantees.

For a typical buyer in 2025 prioritizing bankability, warranty support, and installer availability in North American or European markets, Qcells is the stronger default. HY SOLAR can be price-competitive in large commercial or utility tenders, particularly in markets where it has an established footprint, but the limited third-party documentation of its Tier 1 status makes it a harder sell for lender-financed projects. The two brands are not interchangeable for residential buyers seeking long-term warranty recourse.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-22

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
HY SOLAR A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Q-Cells
Manufacturers
HY SOLAR AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Q-Cells
Manufacturers
HY SOLAR AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Q-Cells
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 25 Q-Cells offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.