Skip to main content

Hansol vs Q-Cells - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Hansol
South Korea Founded 1965
Read the Hansol review
VS
Q-Cells
South Korea Founded 1999 Tier 1
Read the Q-Cells review
At a glance

Q-Cells has the broader catalog (89 vs 22 models). Q-Cells leads on peak efficiency at 23.20%. Q-Cells leans bifacial (39% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
22 89
Highest power
360 Wp 675 Wp
Best efficiency
18.1% 23.2%
Average efficiency
17.1% 21.2%
Bifacial share
0% 39%
Average warranty
25 yrs 27 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Hansol

Hansol Group is a South Korean conglomerate (chaebol) with core operations in paper manufacturing, chemicals, logistics, IT solutions, and home decoration. The group was founded in 1965 and separated from Samsung Group in 1991. Hansol operates through a network of subsidiaries emphasizing innovation and sustainability.

Founded
1965
Headquarters
Seoul, South Korea
Annual capacity
0-1 GW/year
Employees
11,000+
Q-Cells

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...

Founded
1999
Headquarters
Seoul, South Korea
Annual capacity
11.2 GW/year
Employees
2000+
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Hansol Q-Cells
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 22 89+67
Max Power 360 W 675 W+315 W
Avg Power 336 W 468 W+132 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 18.05% 23.20%+5.15 pp
Avg Efficiency 17.10% 21.21%+4.11 pp
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.445%/°C -0.325%/°C+0.120
Bifacial Share 0 (0%) 35 (39%)+39 pp
Avg Warranty 25.0 yrs 27.0 yrs+2.0 yr

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Q-Cells skews to higher efficiency: 2% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Q-Cells offers more 600W+ panels (19% of lineup)

Hansol cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture
Q-Cells cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (43%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Hansol is a South Korean manufacturer headquartered in Seoul, with roots in electronics and materials that date back decades and a solar module division launched around 2010. The company operates a production facility in Ochang, South Korea, with a reported capacity exceeding 600 MW annually - a comparatively modest scale that nonetheless earned it a place on Bloomberg's Tier 1 bankability list. Hanwha Q CELLS, by contrast, originated as a German pioneer of PERC cell technology before being acquired by South Korean conglomerate Hanwha Group; it now operates global module capacity exceeding 11 GW per year and has invested heavily in domestic US manufacturing, with its Georgia factories alone representing roughly 8.4 GW of planned capacity. Both carry Tier 1 status, but Q CELLS commands a significantly larger institutional footprint by virtually every measure of scale and market reach.

Hansol's catalog is oriented toward standard residential and small commercial rooftop installations, offering mono-crystalline modules in the 280-355 W range that appeal to cost-conscious buyers in Korea and select export markets. Q CELLS, under its Q.ANTUM branding, builds on PERC technology and targets the full spectrum from premium residential rooftops to utility-scale ground mounts; its product families are distributed widely across North America, Europe, and Australia, backed by 25-to-30-year performance warranties and a manufacturing footprint that includes US-made modules qualifying for domestic content incentives under the Inflation Reduction Act.

For a typical residential or commercial buyer in 2025, Q CELLS is the stronger default choice - its combination of broad installer availability, Tier 1 bankability, mature warranty infrastructure, and verified Q.ANTUM performance data provides more confidence across more markets. Hansol remains a credible option for buyers specifically sourcing Korean-made panels or operating in markets where Hansol has established distribution, but it does not yet match Q CELLS in global reach or product breadth.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-16

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Hansol A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Q-Cells
Manufacturers
Hansol AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Q-Cells
Manufacturers
Hansol AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Q-Cells
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 23 Q-Cells offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.