Skip to main content

GoodWe vs Q-Cells - solar panel manufacturer comparison

GoodWe
China Founded 2010 Tier 1
Read the GoodWe review
VS
Q-Cells
South Korea Founded 1999 Tier 1
Read the Q-Cells review
At a glance

Q-Cells has the broader catalog (89 vs 0 models). Q-Cells leans bifacial (39% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
0 89
Highest power
0 Wp 675 Wp
Best efficiency
- 23.2%
Average efficiency
- 21.2%
Bifacial share
0% 39%
Average warranty
- 27 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
GoodWe

GoodWe is a world-leading solar inverter and smart energy solution provider headquartered in Suzhou, China. The company manufactures a broad range of inverters from 0.7 kW to 350 kW for residential, commercial, industrial, and utility-scale applications, as well as battery storage systems. Listed on the Shanghai Stock...

Founded
2010
Headquarters
Suzhou, China
Employees
5000+
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Q-Cells

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...

Founded
1999
Headquarters
Seoul, South Korea
Annual capacity
11.2 GW/year
Employees
2000+
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric GoodWe Q-Cells
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 0 89+89
Max Power 0 W 675 W+675 W
Avg Power 0 W 468 W+468 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency - 23.20%
Avg Efficiency - 21.21%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient - -0.325%/°C
Bifacial Share 0 (0%) 35 (39%)+39 pp
Avg Warranty - 27.0 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Q-Cells skews to higher efficiency: 2% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Q-Cells offers more 600W+ panels (19% of lineup)

GoodWe cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture
Q-Cells cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (43%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
GoodWe all models
No panels from this manufacturer are in the database yet.
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

GoodWe is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, founded in 2010. The company built its reputation almost entirely on power inverters: BloombergNEF and S&P Global Commodity Insights both recognise it as a Tier 1 inverter supplier, and its inverter production capacity stands at roughly 35 GW per year with more than 100 GW of cumulative global installations. GoodWe does market a solar module line - most notably the Polaris Series featuring TOPCon bifacial cells - but panels remain a secondary offering next to its inverter and storage business. Q CELLS traces its origins to Germany, where it was founded in 1999; it is now the solar division of South Korean conglomerate Hanwha, operating as Hanwha Q CELLS. The company carries BloombergNEF Tier 1 status as a panel manufacturer and has a global module production capacity of around 11 GW per year. Its US footprint is particularly significant: factories in Dalton and Cartersville, Georgia combine for up to 8.4 GW of planned annual module output, making Hanwha the largest crystalline-silicon panel producer in the Western Hemisphere. On institutional scale and dedicated panel manufacturing depth, Q CELLS holds the stronger position.

Q CELLS' core residential and light-commercial product, the Q.TRON line built on the company's Q.ANTUM NEO platform - a TOPCon-derived cell architecture - reaches efficiencies above 22.5% and carries a 25-year product warranty, pricing roughly 15-20% below ultra-premium brands such as Maxeon. SolarReviews ranked Q CELLS third among all panel manufacturers for 2025. GoodWe's Polaris modules use standard TOPCon cells in a bifacial format, making them suitable for carports, flat-to-pitched roof retrofits, and smaller commercial arrays, but independent long-term reliability data on GoodWe panels is far thinner than for Q CELLS, whose modules have been tested in the field for over a decade.

For a buyer choosing solar panels specifically in 2025, Q CELLS is the clearer default. It offers a mature, well-documented TOPCon product family backed by a large, financially stable parent, a meaningful US manufacturing presence, and strong third-party review coverage. GoodWe is worth considering when the purchase centres on an inverter-plus-panel system from a single vendor, but buyers focused purely on panel performance and warranty depth will find Q CELLS the more purpose-built choice.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-08

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
GoodWe A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Q-Cells
Manufacturers
GoodWe AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Q-Cells
Manufacturers
GoodWe AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Q-Cells
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 25 Q-Cells offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.