Skip to main content

GoodWe vs JA Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison

GoodWe
China Founded 2010 Tier 1
Read the GoodWe review
VS
JA Solar
China Founded 2005 Tier 1
Read the JA Solar review
At a glance

JA Solar has the broader catalog (504 vs 0 models). JA Solar leans bifacial (47% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
0 504
Highest power
0 Wp 740 Wp
Best efficiency
- 24.8%
Average efficiency
- 21.1%
Bifacial share
0% 47%
Average warranty
- 28 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
GoodWe

GoodWe is a world-leading solar inverter and smart energy solution provider headquartered in Suzhou, China. The company manufactures a broad range of inverters from 0.7 kW to 350 kW for residential, commercial, industrial, and utility-scale applications, as well as battery storage systems. Listed on the Shanghai Stock...

Founded
2010
Headquarters
Suzhou, China
Employees
5000+
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
JA Solar

JA Solar is a global leader in the manufacturing of high-performance photovoltaic products. Founded in 2005, the company designs, develops, manufactures, and sells solar cells and modules. JA Solar's products are used in ground-mounted power plants, commercial & industrial rooftop PV systems, and residential rooftop...

Founded
2005
Headquarters
Beijing, China
Annual capacity
100+ GW/year
Employees
37,289
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric GoodWe JA Solar
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 0 504+504
Max Power 0 W 740 W+740 W
Avg Power 0 W 456 W+456 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency - 24.80%
Avg Efficiency - 21.13%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient - -0.322%/°C
Bifacial Share 0 (0%) 238 (47%)+47 pp
Avg Warranty - 27.9 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

JA Solar skews to higher efficiency: 15% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

JA Solar offers more 600W+ panels (14% of lineup)

GoodWe cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture
JA Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (49%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
GoodWe all models
No panels from this manufacturer are in the database yet.
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

GoodWe is a Chinese energy technology company founded in 2010 and headquartered in Suzhou, Jiangsu province. It is recognised globally first and foremost as a solar inverter manufacturer - BloombergNEF named it a Tier 1 power inverter manufacturer for Q2 2025, and the company reported an inverter production capacity of 35 GW with cumulative installations exceeding 100 GW across more than 100 countries by early 2025. Listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange since 2020, GoodWe has expanded its portfolio to include battery storage, EV chargers, and a building-integrated photovoltaics (BIPV) division under the PVBM brand, but its core market identity remains that of an inverter and smart energy solutions provider rather than a conventional panel manufacturer. JA Solar, founded in 2005 and headquartered in Shanghai, operates in an entirely different scale as a module supplier. Holding Tier 1 status according to BloombergNEF and S&P Global Commodity Insights, JA Solar reached a total module production capacity of 100 GW by end of 2024 and cumulative global shipments approaching 300 GW by mid-2025, serving customers in more than 165 countries. As a panel manufacturer, JA Solar carries a substantially stronger institutional footprint than GoodWe.

JA Solar's product lineup is anchored by its Deep Blue series, covering residential rooftop, commercial and industrial (C&I), and utility-scale ground-mount segments. The Deep Blue 4.0 family uses n-type TOPCon cells in a bifacial configuration, and the newly unveiled Deep Blue 5.0 generation reaches a rated power of 670 W with a module efficiency of 24.8%, placing JA Solar at the leading edge of high-efficiency mass-market production. GoodWe's PVBM division offers the Galaxy Series - ultra-lightweight BIPV panels for low load-bearing roofs - and the Nebula Series, which integrates TOPCon cells into architectural glass facades. These are niche products designed to complement GoodWe inverter ecosystems rather than serve as conventional rooftop or ground-mount module alternatives.

For any buyer evaluating solar panels - residential, C&I, or utility-scale - JA Solar is the clear and relevant choice between these two brands. Comparing them as competing panel manufacturers is largely a category mismatch: GoodWe competes as a credible Tier 1 inverter and hybrid system supplier, while JA Solar stands as one of the world's most bankable module producers. Buyers exploring GoodWe should do so in the context of inverter or integrated system procurement, not panel selection.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-14

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
GoodWe A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar JA Solar
Manufacturers
GoodWe AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO JA Solar
Manufacturers
GoodWe AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar JA Solar
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 333 JA Solar offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.