Skip to main content

GCL vs ZNShine - solar panel manufacturer comparison

GCL
China Founded 1990 Tier 1
Read the GCL review
VS
ZNShine
China Founded 1988 Tier 1
Read the ZNShine review
At a glance

GCL has the broader catalog (232 vs 212 models). GCL leads on peak efficiency at 24.50%. GCL leans bifacial (65% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
232 212
Highest power
740 Wp 670 Wp
Best efficiency
24.5% 22.8%
Average efficiency
22.0% 21.3%
Bifacial share
65% 42%
Average warranty
28 yrs 28 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
GCL

GCL is a global company focusing on green energy and high-efficiency photovoltaic materials. They are known for their innovation in polysilicon and wafer technologies, with a focus on low-carbon solutions. GCL is committed to building a low-carbon PV value chain and advancing global clean energy transformation.

Founded
1990
Headquarters
Suzhou/Hong Kong, China
Annual capacity
30+ GW/year
Employees
6000+
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
ZNShine

ZNShine Solar is a high-tech PV enterprise specializing in R&D, manufacturing, and sales of solar modules. They also provide integrated photovoltaic, battery storage, and green hydrogen solutions, as well as BIPV, rooftop solar, and utility-scale solar solutions with a commitment to boosting green electricity...

Founded
1988
Headquarters
Suqian, China
Annual capacity
10 GW/year
Employees
1,200
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric GCL ZNShine
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 232+20 212
Max Power 740 W+70 W 670 W
Avg Power 558 W+24 W 535 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 24.50%+1.67 pp 22.83%
Avg Efficiency 22.03%+0.68 pp 21.35%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.320%/°C+0.009 -0.329%/°C
Bifacial Share 151 (65%)+23 pp 89 (42%)
Avg Warranty 28.4 yrs+0.1 yr 28.3 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

GCL skews to higher efficiency: 28% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

GCL offers more 600W+ panels (44% of lineup)

GCL cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: TOPCon (47%)

ZNShine cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: PERC (63%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

GCL (GCL System Integration Technology Co., Ltd.) is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Jiangsu province and one of the largest solar module suppliers in the world. The company holds Tier 1 status with Bloomberg NEF and shipped approximately 16 GW of modules in 2023, rising to roughly 25 GW in 2024 - a 52% year-on-year increase - against an installed production capacity of around 30 GW per year. ZNShine (ZNSHINE PV-TECH Co., Ltd.) is also a Chinese manufacturer, based in Suqian, Jiangsu, operating three production facilities in Changzhou, Suqian, and Dali with a combined module capacity of approximately 10 GW per year. ZNShine has maintained BNEF Tier 1 status since 2015 and was upgraded to a B rating in PV Tech's separate bankability ranking, reflecting solid but more modest institutional standing. On the basis of production scale and global market reach, GCL carries a considerably stronger footprint.

GCL's current commercial lineup is anchored in n-type TOPCon technology, most notably through its LOTUS series, which delivers outputs up to 700 W at module efficiency levels reaching 22.53%. The company also entered the back-contact segment in early 2025 with a 660 W module, and is investing heavily in perovskite-tandem technology for next-generation products. GCL's portfolio spans large utility-scale ground-mounted arrays, commercial and industrial rooftop systems, and the residential segment, with growing availability across European, Australian, and North American markets. ZNShine offers both monocrystalline half-cut PERC and bifacial TOPCon modules with efficiency figures in a comparable range. A notable differentiator in ZNShine's lineup is the use of graphene-coated glass engineered to be self-cleaning, which can be a practical advantage in dusty or low-maintenance installations. ZNShine targets residential, commercial, and lighter utility-scale applications.

For most international buyers, GCL is the stronger default choice given its superior scale, technology depth, and global bankability. Its shipment volumes signal supply chain resilience and cost competitiveness that ZNShine cannot yet match at the same level. ZNShine remains a credible Tier 1 option, particularly for buyers who value its graphene self-cleaning glass or who need smaller order quantities with more flexible logistics. In commodity market segments where both brands are available at similar price points, the two are broadly interchangeable, and the decision may ultimately hinge on local installer support and warranty service infrastructure rather than any fundamental difference in panel quality.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-14

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
GCL A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar ZNShine
Manufacturers
GCL AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO ZNShine
Manufacturers
GCL AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar ZNShine
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 2 GCL offers · See 9 ZNShine offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.