Gamko New Energy vs JA Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison
JA Solar has the broader catalog (504 vs 255 models). JA Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Gamko New Energy leans bifacial (81% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
Gamko New Energy is a professional solar module manufacturer with a 10-year experience in production and quality control since 2008. They also provide technical services for solar power plants, including design, installation, and maintenance. In 2018, their production capacity reached 2GW.
- Founded
- 2008
- Headquarters
- Nantong, Jiangsu, China
- Annual capacity
- 1.2 GW/year
- Employees
- 201-300
JA Solar is a global leader in the manufacturing of high-performance photovoltaic products. Founded in 2005, the company designs, develops, manufactures, and sells solar cells and modules. JA Solar's products are used in ground-mounted power plants, commercial & industrial rooftop PV systems, and residential rooftop...
- Founded
- 2005
- Headquarters
- Beijing, China
- Annual capacity
- 100+ GW/year
- Employees
- 37,289
- Listed
- SZSE: 002459
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
Gamko New Energy skews to higher efficiency: 40% of lineup is 23%+
Gamko New Energy offers more 600W+ panels (23% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (57%)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (49%)
The flagships
Written summary
Gamko New Energy and JA Solar are both Chinese solar module manufacturers, but they occupy fundamentally different positions in the global PV industry. JA Solar, founded in 2005 and listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, is one of the world's largest module producers, with a manufacturing capacity exceeding 100 GW per year and a workforce of over 37,000 employees. The company holds Tier 1 bankable status from BloombergNEF for over a decade and from S&P Global Commodity Insights, and jointly claimed the top rank in Wood Mackenzie's Global Solar Module Manufacturer Ranking for H1 2025. It is actively present in Europe including Poland. Gamko New Energy, established in 2008 and headquartered in Nantong, operates on a considerably smaller scale - with a reported annual capacity of 1.2 GW and a team of 201-300 employees - and does not appear on major Tier 1 bankability lists.
Both manufacturers anchor their respective portfolios in PERC cell technology (approximately 51-52% of panels each), with JA Solar expanding into TOPCon through its Deep Blue series and Gamko supplementing its offer with TOPCon models as well. Gamko's catalog of 255 panels delivers a higher average module power of 500 Wp and a notably high bifacial share of 81.18%, making its products well-suited for residential rooftop installations on pitched south-facing roofs and small-to-medium commercial C&I projects where power density is a priority. The 30-year product warranty is a strong selling point for end customers. JA Solar's broader catalog of 524 panels, combined with its Tier 1 status and a temperature coefficient of -0.323%/°C (marginally better than Gamko's -0.332%/°C), makes it the standard choice for utility-scale ground-mount projects and bank-financed commercial installations. JA Solar's average efficiency of 20.87% trails Gamko's 22.06%, partly reflecting the weight of older PERC models still present across its wide portfolio.
For international buyers - developers, EPCs, or large-scale installers - JA Solar's bankability credentials, global supply chain depth, and proven long-term reliability record make it the lower-risk selection, particularly where project financing or insurance requirements mandate Tier 1 status. Gamko New Energy can be a competitive option for price-sensitive residential installers or distributors who prioritize high bifaciality and a full 30-year product warranty, but its limited global footprint and absence from bankability rankings make it less suitable for projects where the manufacturer's financial resilience is a key underwriting consideration.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-08
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 389 JA Solar offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.