Skip to main content

DAH vs GCL - solar panel manufacturer comparison

DAH
China Founded 2009 Tier 1
Read the DAH review
VS
GCL
China Founded 1990 Tier 1
Read the GCL review
At a glance

GCL has the broader catalog (232 vs 0 models). GCL leans bifacial (65% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
0 232
Highest power
0 Wp 740 Wp
Best efficiency
- 24.5%
Average efficiency
- 22.0%
Bifacial share
0% 65%
Average warranty
- 28 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
DAH
Founded
2009
Headquarters
Hefei, China
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
GCL

GCL is a global company focusing on green energy and high-efficiency photovoltaic materials. They are known for their innovation in polysilicon and wafer technologies, with a focus on low-carbon solutions. GCL is committed to building a low-carbon PV value chain and advancing global clean energy transformation.

Founded
1990
Headquarters
Suzhou/Hong Kong, China
Annual capacity
30+ GW/year
Employees
6000+
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric DAH GCL
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 0 232+232
Max Power 0 W 740 W+740 W
Avg Power 0 W 558 W+558 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency - 24.50%
Avg Efficiency - 22.03%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient - -0.320%/°C
Bifacial Share 0 (0%) 151 (65%)+65 pp
Avg Warranty - 28.4 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

GCL skews to higher efficiency: 28% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

GCL offers more 600W+ panels (44% of lineup)

DAH cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture
GCL cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: TOPCon (47%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
No panels from this manufacturer are in the database yet.
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

DAH Solar and GCL are both Chinese solar panel manufacturers holding Tier 1 bankable status according to BNEF, but they differ markedly in scale, history, and technology strategy. GCL was founded in 1990 and has grown into one of the world's largest photovoltaic enterprises, with an annual production capacity exceeding 30 GW, a workforce of over 6,000 employees, and dual listings on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange and the Shenzhen Stock Exchange. DAH Solar, established in 2009, is a younger and more focused company that has built its reputation on continuous innovation - holding over 200 patents and maintaining Tier 1 status on the BNEF list through Q4 2025. Both manufacturers offer panels in the high-power segment, with DAH Solar's maximum at 725 Wp and GCL's at 730 Wp, while GCL's average portfolio power of approximately 552 Wp is modestly higher than DAH Solar's 522 Wp.

The two manufacturers diverge clearly in their technology approach. DAH Solar has committed strongly to TOPCon cell technology, which accounts for 81% of its 356-panel catalog, and nearly 89% of its modules are bifacial - figures that position it firmly in the premium, next-generation segment. Its average efficiency of 22.13%, with a maximum of 23.34%, and an average temperature coefficient of -0.298%/°C are particularly well suited to residential rooftop installations and commercial C&I projects where efficiency per square meter and output stability in warm conditions are priorities. The average warranty across its portfolio reaches approximately 29.5 years. GCL's portfolio of 205 models still leans on PERC technology as its most represented cell type at 36%, with bifacial modules accounting for around 61% of its lineup. However, GCL's peak efficiency of 24.06% and massive production scale make it a natural fit for utility-scale ground-mount projects and large-volume procurement, where supply reliability, pricing leverage, and established logistics networks are decisive factors. GCL's average warranty stands at approximately 28.1 years.

For international buyers selecting between the two, the choice largely depends on project type and procurement priority. DAH Solar offers a more technologically advanced and homogeneous portfolio, making it the stronger option for residential and C&I segments where bifacial TOPCon performance and temperature behavior matter. GCL's primary advantage lies in its exceptional production scale and long market track record, making it the preferred partner for developers and EPCs executing large utility-scale pipelines where volume, price, and supply chain continuity are paramount.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-12

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
DAH A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar GCL
Manufacturers
DAH AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO GCL
Manufacturers
DAH AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar GCL
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 3 GCL offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.