Skip to main content

DAH Solar vs GCL - solar panel manufacturer comparison

DAH Solar
China Founded 2009 Tier 1
Read the DAH Solar review
VS
GCL
China Founded 1990 Tier 1
Read the GCL review
At a glance

DAH Solar has the broader catalog (363 vs 232 models). GCL leads on peak efficiency at 24.50%. DAH Solar leans bifacial (87% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
363 232
Highest power
725 Wp 740 Wp
Best efficiency
23.3% 24.5%
Average efficiency
22.1% 22.0%
Bifacial share
87% 65%
Average warranty
29 yrs 28 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
DAH Solar

DAH Solar is an innovation-driven and technology-leading company specializing in PV product manufacturing. They focus on R&D, manufacturing, and sales of high-efficiency PV modules, integrated PV systems, and solar energy storage systems. DAH Solar is known for its patented Full-Screen PV Module and SolarUnit...

Founded
2009
Headquarters
Hefei, China
Annual capacity
10 GW/year
Employees
2000+
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
GCL

GCL is a global company focusing on green energy and high-efficiency photovoltaic materials. They are known for their innovation in polysilicon and wafer technologies, with a focus on low-carbon solutions. GCL is committed to building a low-carbon PV value chain and advancing global clean energy transformation.

Founded
1990
Headquarters
Suzhou/Hong Kong, China
Annual capacity
30+ GW/year
Employees
6000+
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric DAH Solar GCL
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 363+131 232
Max Power 725 W 740 W+15 W
Avg Power 520 W 558 W+38 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 23.34% 24.50%+1.16 pp
Avg Efficiency 22.10%+0.08 pp 22.03%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.299%/°C+0.022 -0.320%/°C
Bifacial Share 316 (87%)+22 pp 151 (65%)
Avg Warranty 29.4 yrs+1.0 yr 28.4 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

GCL skews to higher efficiency: 28% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

GCL offers more 600W+ panels (44% of lineup)

DAH Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: TOPCon (88%)

GCL cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: TOPCon (47%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

DAH Solar and GCL are both Chinese Tier 1 BNEF-rated solar module manufacturers, though they differ substantially in scale, history, and market positioning. DAH Solar was founded in 2009 in Hefei, China, and has grown to a production capacity of 10 GW with over 2,000 employees, maintaining a focused identity as a specialist panel manufacturer. GCL, established in 1990, is part of a broader energy conglomerate with diversified interests across wind, storage, and hydrogen, and operates at a significantly larger scale - with production capacity exceeding 30 GW and more than 6,000 employees. GCL is publicly listed on both the Hong Kong Stock Exchange and the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, providing a higher degree of financial transparency. Both manufacturers hold confirmed BNEF Tier 1 bankability status as of Q1 2025, making them financeable choices for project developers globally.

DAH Solar has built its technology identity firmly around TOPCon cells, which account for nearly 80% of its panel portfolio, with a signature innovation being the Full-Screen frameless module design that reduces soiling and improves light capture. Its lineup leans heavily bifacial at around 87% of panels, and it delivers a favorable average temperature coefficient of -0.299%/°C - making it well suited for residential rooftop installs and commercial C&I projects where long-term reliability matters. Average product warranties across the DAH Solar range reach 29.4 years. GCL's portfolio has historically been led by PERC technology (its most represented cell type at 36% of the lineup), but the company is actively transitioning to TOPCon, with its latest flagship modules reaching 730 Wp and a peak module efficiency of 24.06% - the highest of the two manufacturers. A higher average module power output of 551.8 Wp compared to DAH Solar's 520.3 Wp, combined with independently strong PVEL test results, makes GCL a compelling option for utility-scale ground-mount projects where power density and cost per watt are the primary drivers.

International buyers choosing between the two will find DAH Solar the more mature choice in premium residential and C&I segments, backed by its focused TOPCon-first strategy, high bifacial penetration, and longer average warranties. GCL, with its much larger manufacturing scale, exchange-listed financial transparency, and rapidly improving high-power TOPCon lineup, is better positioned for large-scale procurement in utility and infrastructure projects where supply chain depth and competitive volume pricing are decisive.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-12

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
DAH Solar A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar GCL
Manufacturers
DAH Solar AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO GCL
Manufacturers
DAH Solar AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar GCL
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 8 DAH Solar offers · See 3 GCL offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.