Skip to main content
435/N vs 425/N 16 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

ZNShine ZXM7-UHLD108-435/N vs ZNShine ZXM7-UHLD108-425/N

ZXM7-UHLD108-435/N
435 Wp 22.28 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
ZXM7-UHLD108-425/N
425 Wp 21.76 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

435/N leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.52 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
16 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

3 of 19 parameters
Parameter 435/N 425/N Difference
Module efficiency 22.28 % 21.76 % 0.52 pp more efficient
Power density 222.8 Wp/m² 217.6 Wp/m² 5.1 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 435 Wp 425 Wp 10 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
435/N
14,595 kWh
425/N
14,260 kWh
Lifetime gap
335 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 435/N 425/N
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 435 W 425 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 415 W 406 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 396 W 387 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 376 W 368 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 435/N 425/N Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 435 Wp 425 Wp +10 W for 435/N
Module efficiency 22.28 % 21.76 % +0.52 pp for 435/N
Power density 222.8 Wp/m² 217.6 Wp/m² +5.1 Wp/m² for 435/N
Open-circuit voltage 38.70 V 38.30 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 32.10 V 31.70 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 14.26 A 14.12 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.56 A 13.41 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.300 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1722x1134x30 mm 1722x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 1.953 m² 1.953 m² Same
Weight 24.5 kg 24.5 kg Same
Weight per kWp 56.3 kg/kWp 57.6 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 108 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#5,403 vs #7,285
435/N leads by 1,882 places
Power density
#5,150 vs #7,172
435/N leads by 2,022 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093 vs #6,093
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#10,568 vs #11,325
435/N leads by 757 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#9,295 vs #10,001
435/N leads by 706 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
ZNShine ZXM7-UHLD108-435/N vs ZNShine ZXM7-UHLD108-440/N
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
ZNShine ZXM7-UHLD108-435/N vs ZNShine ZXM7-UHLDD108-435
One difference: product warranty
Same series, other bin
ZNShine ZXM7-UHLD108-435/N vs ZNShine ZXM7-UHLD108-430/N
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
ZNShine ZXM7-UHLD108-435/N vs ZNShine ZXM7-UHLDD108-430
2 differences, the largest is product warranty
Same series, other bin
ZNShine ZXM7-UHLD108-435/N vs ZNShine ZXM7-UHLDD108-425
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
ZNShine ZXM7-UHLD108-435/N vs ZNShine ZXM7-UHLDD108-420
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: ZNShine ZXM7-UHLD108-435/N or ZNShine ZXM7-UHLD108-425/N?
According to our database: ZNShine ZXM7-UHLD108-435/N has higher module efficiency (22.28% vs 21.76%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of ZNShine ZXM7-UHLD108-435/N and ZNShine ZXM7-UHLD108-425/N?
ZNShine ZXM7-UHLD108-435/N has a module efficiency of 22.28%, while ZNShine ZXM7-UHLD108-425/N is 21.76%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does ZNShine ZXM7-UHLD108-435/N use vs ZNShine ZXM7-UHLD108-425/N?
ZNShine ZXM7-UHLD108-435/N uses TOPCon cells; ZNShine ZXM7-UHLD108-425/N uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on ZNShine ZXM7-UHLD108-435/N and ZNShine ZXM7-UHLD108-425/N?
ZNShine ZXM7-UHLD108-435/N has a 30 years power warranty; ZNShine ZXM7-UHLD108-425/N has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are ZNShine ZXM7-UHLD108-435/N and ZNShine ZXM7-UHLD108-425/N bifacial panels?
Both ZNShine ZXM7-UHLD108-435/N and ZNShine ZXM7-UHLD108-425/N are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 12 ZNShine offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.