Skip to main content
BiN-08-570 vs AB-G12R-132-630 5 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Waaree BiN-08-570 vs Adani Solar AB-G12R-132-630

BiN-08-570
570 Wp 22.07 % N-type Bifacial
VS
Adani Solar
AB-G12R-132-630
630 Wp 23.34 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

AB-G12R-132-630 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.27 pp more efficient. 5 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 14 differences
How alike are they
5 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

14 of 19 parameters
Parameter BiN-08-570 AB-G12R-132-630 Difference
Module efficiency 22.07 % 23.34 % 1.27 pp more efficient
Rated power 570 Wp 630 Wp 60 W more power
Power density 220.7 Wp/m² 233.4 Wp/m² 12.8 Wp/m² higher
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.280 %/°C 0.020 %/°C better in heat
Short-circuit current 13.81 A 15.94 A 2.13 A apart
Module area 2.583 m² 2.699 m² 0.116 m² apart
Open-circuit voltage 52.10 V 48.80 V 3.30 V apart
Weight per kWp 57.0 kg/kWp 53.3 kg/kWp 3.7 kg/kWp lighter
Cell technology N-type TOPCon N-type vs TOPCon
Current at max power 13.04 A 15.11 A 2.07 A apart
Cell count 144 132 12 cells apart
Weight 32.5 kg 33.6 kg 1.1 kg lighter
Dimensions 2278x1134x33 mm 2382x1133x30 mm 2278x1134x33 mm vs 2382x1133x30 mm
Voltage at max power 43.71 V 41.72 V 1.99 V apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
BiN-08-570
19,125 kWh
AB-G12R-132-630
21,138 kWh
Lifetime gap
2,013 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario BiN-08-570 AB-G12R-132-630
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 570 W 630 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 544 W 604 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 519 W 577 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 493 W 551 W
03

Full specification

Parameter BiN-08-570 AB-G12R-132-630 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 570 Wp 630 Wp +60 W for AB-G12R-132-630
Module efficiency 22.07 % 23.34 % +1.27 pp for AB-G12R-132-630
Power density 220.7 Wp/m² 233.4 Wp/m² +12.8 Wp/m² for AB-G12R-132-630
Open-circuit voltage 52.10 V 48.80 V 3.30 V apart
Voltage at max power 43.71 V 41.72 V 1.99 V apart
Short-circuit current 13.81 A 15.94 A 2.13 A apart
Current at max power 13.04 A 15.11 A 2.07 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.280 %/°C +0.020 %/°C for AB-G12R-132-630
Mechanical
Dimensions 2278x1134x33 mm 2382x1133x30 mm 2278x1134x33 mm vs 2382x1133x30 mm
Module area 2.583 m² 2.699 m² 0.116 m² apart
Weight 32.5 kg 33.6 kg -1.1 kg for BiN-08-570
Weight per kWp 57.0 kg/kWp 53.3 kg/kWp -3.7 kg/kWp for AB-G12R-132-630
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology N-type TOPCon N-type vs TOPCon
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 132 12 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#6,199 vs #981
AB-G12R-132-630 leads by 5,218 places
Power density
#6,121 vs #971
AB-G12R-132-630 leads by 5,150 places
Heat behaviour
#6,152 vs #1,347
AB-G12R-132-630 leads by 4,805 places
Weight
#11,095 vs #7,304
AB-G12R-132-630 leads by 3,791 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#5,396 vs #1,986
AB-G12R-132-630 leads by 3,410 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Waaree BiN-08-570 vs Waaree BiN-08-600
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Waaree BiN-08-570 vs Waaree BiN-08-595
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Waaree BiN-08-570 vs Waaree BiN-08-590
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Waaree BiN-08-570 vs Waaree BiN-08-585
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Waaree BiN-08-570 vs Waaree BiN-08-580
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Waaree BiN-08-570 vs Waaree BiN-08-575
The same specification on paper
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Waaree BiN-08-570 or Adani Solar AB-G12R-132-630?
According to our database: Adani Solar AB-G12R-132-630 has higher module efficiency (23.34% vs 22.07%); Adani Solar AB-G12R-132-630 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.280%/°C vs -0.300%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Waaree BiN-08-570 and Adani Solar AB-G12R-132-630?
Waaree BiN-08-570 has a module efficiency of 22.07%, while Adani Solar AB-G12R-132-630 is 23.34%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Waaree BiN-08-570 use vs Adani Solar AB-G12R-132-630?
Waaree BiN-08-570 uses N-type cells; Adani Solar AB-G12R-132-630 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Waaree BiN-08-570 and Adani Solar AB-G12R-132-630?
Waaree BiN-08-570 has a 30 years power warranty; Adani Solar AB-G12R-132-630 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Waaree BiN-08-570 and Adani Solar AB-G12R-132-630 bifacial panels?
Both Waaree BiN-08-570 and Adani Solar AB-G12R-132-630 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Compare Waaree and Adani Solar as manufacturers Portfolio, efficiency, cell technologies and warranty terms

Shop prices: See 24 Waaree offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.