Skip to main content
BiH-11-725 vs Bi-68-665 9 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Waaree BiH-11-725 vs Waaree Bi-68-665

Waaree BiH-11-725
BiH-11-725
725 Wp 23.34 % HJT Bifacial
VS
Waaree Bi-68-665
Bi-68-665
665 Wp 21.29 % PERC Bifacial
The verdict

BiH-11-725 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 2.05 pp more efficient. 9 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 10 differences
How alike are they
9 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

10 of 19 parameters
Parameter BiH-11-725 Bi-68-665 Difference
Module efficiency 23.34 % 21.29 % 2.05 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient -0.240 %/°C -0.340 %/°C 0.100 %/°C better in heat
Rated power 725 Wp 665 Wp 60 W more power
Power density 233.4 Wp/m² 212.8 Wp/m² 20.6 Wp/m² higher
Annual degradation 0.30 %/yr 0.55 %/yr 0.25 %/yr slower
Open-circuit voltage 50.49 V 46.58 V 3.91 V apart
Weight per kWp 53.8 kg/kWp 58.6 kg/kWp 4.9 kg/kWp lighter
Cell technology HJT PERC HJT vs PERC
Voltage at max power 42.40 V 38.10 V 4.30 V apart
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 2400x1302x35 mm 2384x1303x35 mm vs 2400x1302x35 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
BiH-11-725
24,704 kWh
Bi-68-665
21,552 kWh
Lifetime gap
3,152 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario BiH-11-725 Bi-68-665
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 725 W 665 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.9% of rated power 699 W 631 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.8% of rated power 673 W 597 W
Hot roof 70 °C 84.7% of rated power 647 W 563 W
03

Full specification

Parameter BiH-11-725 Bi-68-665 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 725 Wp 665 Wp +60 W for BiH-11-725
Module efficiency 23.34 % 21.29 % +2.05 pp for BiH-11-725
Power density 233.4 Wp/m² 212.8 Wp/m² +20.6 Wp/m² for BiH-11-725
Open-circuit voltage 50.49 V 46.58 V 3.91 V apart
Voltage at max power 42.40 V 38.10 V 4.30 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.15 A 18.03 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.10 A 17.46 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.240 %/°C -0.340 %/°C +0.100 %/°C for BiH-11-725
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 2400x1302x35 mm 2384x1303x35 mm vs 2400x1302x35 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 3.125 m² Effectively the same
Weight 39.0 kg 39.0 kg Same
Weight per kWp 53.8 kg/kWp 58.6 kg/kWp -4.9 kg/kWp for BiH-11-725
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.30 %/yr 0.55 %/yr -0.25 %/yr for BiH-11-725
Technology
Cell technology HJT PERC HJT vs PERC
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#943 vs #8,708
BiH-11-725 leads by 7,765 places
Power density
#936 vs #8,707
BiH-11-725 leads by 7,771 places
Heat behaviour
#13 vs #8,778
BiH-11-725 leads by 8,765 places
Weight
#7,866 vs #11,826
BiH-11-725 leads by 3,960 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#412 vs #2,941
BiH-11-725 leads by 2,529 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Waaree BiH-11-725 vs Waaree BiH-11-730
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Waaree BiH-11-725 vs Waaree BiH-11-720
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Waaree BiH-11-725 vs Waaree BiH-11-715
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Waaree BiH-11-725 vs Waaree BiH-11-710
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Waaree BiH-11-725 vs Waaree BiH-11-705
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Waaree BiH-11-725 vs Waaree BiH-11-700
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Waaree BiH-11-725 or Waaree Bi-68-665?
According to our database: Waaree BiH-11-725 has higher module efficiency (23.34% vs 21.29%); Waaree BiH-11-725 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.240%/°C vs -0.340%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Waaree BiH-11-725 and Waaree Bi-68-665?
Waaree BiH-11-725 has a module efficiency of 23.34%, while Waaree Bi-68-665 is 21.29%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Waaree BiH-11-725 use vs Waaree Bi-68-665?
Waaree BiH-11-725 uses HJT cells; Waaree Bi-68-665 uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Waaree BiH-11-725 and Waaree Bi-68-665?
Waaree BiH-11-725 has a 30 years power warranty; Waaree Bi-68-665 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Waaree BiH-11-725 and Waaree Bi-68-665 bifacial panels?
Both Waaree BiH-11-725 and Waaree Bi-68-665 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 26 Waaree offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.