Skip to main content
BiH-11-705 vs Bi-68-665 8 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Waaree BiH-11-705 vs Waaree Bi-68-665

Waaree BiH-11-705
BiH-11-705
705 Wp 22.70 % HJT Bifacial
VS
Waaree Bi-68-665
Bi-68-665
665 Wp 21.29 % PERC Bifacial
The verdict

BiH-11-705 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.41 pp more efficient. 8 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 11 differences
How alike are they
8 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

11 of 19 parameters
Parameter BiH-11-705 Bi-68-665 Difference
Module efficiency 22.70 % 21.29 % 1.41 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient -0.240 %/°C -0.340 %/°C 0.100 %/°C better in heat
Rated power 705 Wp 665 Wp 40 W more power
Power density 227.0 Wp/m² 212.8 Wp/m² 14.1 Wp/m² higher
Annual degradation 0.30 %/yr 0.55 %/yr 0.25 %/yr slower
Open-circuit voltage 49.96 V 46.58 V 3.38 V apart
Cell technology HJT PERC HJT vs PERC
Weight per kWp 55.3 kg/kWp 58.6 kg/kWp 3.3 kg/kWp lighter
Voltage at max power 41.91 V 38.10 V 3.81 V apart
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 2400x1302x35 mm 2384x1303x35 mm vs 2400x1302x35 mm
Current at max power 16.82 A 17.46 A 0.64 A apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
BiH-11-705
24,022 kWh
Bi-68-665
21,552 kWh
Lifetime gap
2,470 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario BiH-11-705 Bi-68-665
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 705 W 665 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.9% of rated power 680 W 631 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.8% of rated power 654 W 597 W
Hot roof 70 °C 84.7% of rated power 629 W 563 W
03

Full specification

Parameter BiH-11-705 Bi-68-665 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 705 Wp 665 Wp +40 W for BiH-11-705
Module efficiency 22.70 % 21.29 % +1.41 pp for BiH-11-705
Power density 227.0 Wp/m² 212.8 Wp/m² +14.1 Wp/m² for BiH-11-705
Open-circuit voltage 49.96 V 46.58 V 3.38 V apart
Voltage at max power 41.91 V 38.10 V 3.81 V apart
Short-circuit current 17.87 A 18.03 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 16.82 A 17.46 A 0.64 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.240 %/°C -0.340 %/°C +0.100 %/°C for BiH-11-705
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 2400x1302x35 mm 2384x1303x35 mm vs 2400x1302x35 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 3.125 m² Effectively the same
Weight 39.0 kg 39.0 kg Same
Weight per kWp 55.3 kg/kWp 58.6 kg/kWp -3.3 kg/kWp for BiH-11-705
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.30 %/yr 0.55 %/yr -0.25 %/yr for BiH-11-705
Technology
Cell technology HJT PERC HJT vs PERC
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#3,307 vs #8,708
BiH-11-705 leads by 5,401 places
Power density
#3,361 vs #8,707
BiH-11-705 leads by 5,346 places
Heat behaviour
#13 vs #8,778
BiH-11-705 leads by 8,765 places
Weight
#9,775 vs #11,826
BiH-11-705 leads by 2,051 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,037 vs #2,941
BiH-11-705 leads by 1,904 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Waaree BiH-11-705 vs Waaree BiH-11-730
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Waaree BiH-11-705 vs Waaree BiH-11-725
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Waaree BiH-11-705 vs Waaree BiH-11-720
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Waaree BiH-11-705 vs Waaree BiH-11-715
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Waaree BiH-11-705 vs Waaree BiH-11-710
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Waaree BiH-11-705 vs Waaree BiH-11-700
The same specification on paper
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Waaree BiH-11-705 or Waaree Bi-68-665?
According to our database: Waaree BiH-11-705 has higher module efficiency (22.70% vs 21.29%); Waaree BiH-11-705 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.240%/°C vs -0.340%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Waaree BiH-11-705 and Waaree Bi-68-665?
Waaree BiH-11-705 has a module efficiency of 22.70%, while Waaree Bi-68-665 is 21.29%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Waaree BiH-11-705 use vs Waaree Bi-68-665?
Waaree BiH-11-705 uses HJT cells; Waaree Bi-68-665 uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Waaree BiH-11-705 and Waaree Bi-68-665?
Waaree BiH-11-705 has a 30 years power warranty; Waaree Bi-68-665 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Waaree BiH-11-705 and Waaree Bi-68-665 bifacial panels?
Both Waaree BiH-11-705 and Waaree Bi-68-665 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 26 Waaree offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.