Skip to main content
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.725.05 vs HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 10 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.725.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05

Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.725.05
Vikram Solar
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.725.05
725 Wp 23.34 % HJT Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05
Vikram Solar
HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05
725 Wp 23.34 % N-type Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

9 differences, and they point both ways

The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.020 %/°C better in heat. 10 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 9 differences
How alike are they
10 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

9 of 19 parameters
Parameter SURYAVA VSMDH.66.725.05 HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 Difference
Temperature coefficient -0.260 %/°C -0.280 %/°C 0.020 %/°C better in heat
Weight 39.5 kg 37.5 kg 2.0 kg lighter
Cell technology HJT N-type HJT vs N-type
Weight per kWp 54.5 kg/kWp 51.7 kg/kWp 2.8 kg/kWp lighter
Short-circuit current 17.70 A 18.56 A 0.86 A apart
Open-circuit voltage 51.25 V 49.60 V 1.65 V apart
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x35 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Voltage at max power 42.86 V 41.40 V 1.46 V apart
Current at max power 16.92 A 17.52 A 0.60 A apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.725.05
24,401 kWh
HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05
24,325 kWh
Lifetime gap
76 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario SURYAVA VSMDH.66.725.05 HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 725 W 725 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.8% of rated power 697 W 695 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.6% of rated power 668 W 664 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.4% of rated power 640 W 634 W
03

Full specification

Parameter SURYAVA VSMDH.66.725.05 HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 725 Wp 725 Wp Same
Module efficiency 23.34 % 23.34 % Same
Power density 233.4 Wp/m² 233.4 Wp/m² Same
Open-circuit voltage 51.25 V 49.60 V 1.65 V apart
Voltage at max power 42.86 V 41.40 V 1.46 V apart
Short-circuit current 17.70 A 18.56 A 0.86 A apart
Current at max power 16.92 A 17.52 A 0.60 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.260 %/°C -0.280 %/°C +0.020 %/°C for SURYAVA VSMDH.66.725.05
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x35 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 39.5 kg 37.5 kg -2.0 kg for HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05
Weight per kWp 54.5 kg/kWp 51.7 kg/kWp -2.8 kg/kWp for HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.38 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Effectively the same
Technology
Cell technology HJT N-type HJT vs N-type
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#981 vs #981
Tied - the same position in the database
Power density
#974 vs #974
Tied - the same position in the database
Heat behaviour
#515 vs #1,347
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.725.05 leads by 832 places
Weight
#8,910 vs #5,114
HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 leads by 3,796 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#428 vs #402
HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 leads by 26 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.725.05 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.725.05 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.725.05 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.720.05
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.725.05 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.715.05
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.725.05 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.730.05
The same specification on paper
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.725.05 or Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05?
According to our database: Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.725.05 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.280%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.725.05 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05?
Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.725.05 has a module efficiency of 23.34%, while Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 is 23.34%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.725.05 use vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05?
Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.725.05 uses HJT cells; Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.725.05 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05?
Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.725.05 has a 30 years power warranty; Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.725.05 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 bifacial panels?
Both Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.725.05 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.