Skip to main content
715.05 vs 725.05 16 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.715.05 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.725.05

Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.715.05
Vikram Solar
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.715.05
715 Wp 23.02 % HJT Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.725.05
Vikram Solar
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.725.05
725 Wp 23.34 % HJT Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

725.05 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.32 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
16 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

3 of 19 parameters
Parameter 715.05 725.05 Difference
Module efficiency 23.02 % 23.34 % 0.32 pp more efficient
Power density 230.2 Wp/m² 233.4 Wp/m² 3.2 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 715 Wp 725 Wp 10 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.260 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
715.05
24,064 kWh
725.05
24,401 kWh
Lifetime gap
337 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 715.05 725.05
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 715 W 725 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 96.1% of rated power 687 W 697 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 92.2% of rated power 659 W 668 W
Hot roof 70 °C 88.3% of rated power 631 W 640 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 715.05 725.05 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 715 Wp 725 Wp +10 W for 725.05
Module efficiency 23.02 % 23.34 % +0.32 pp for 725.05
Power density 230.2 Wp/m² 233.4 Wp/m² +3.2 Wp/m² for 725.05
Open-circuit voltage 50.95 V 51.25 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 42.57 V 42.86 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 17.58 A 17.70 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 16.80 A 16.92 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.260 %/°C -0.260 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x35 mm Same
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 39.5 kg 39.5 kg Same
Weight per kWp 55.2 kg/kWp 54.5 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.38 %/yr 0.38 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology HJT HJT Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#1,797 vs #943
725.05 leads by 854 places
Power density
#2,018 vs #936
725.05 leads by 1,082 places
Heat behaviour
#511 vs #511
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#9,680 vs #8,829
725.05 leads by 851 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#721 vs #421
725.05 leads by 300 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.715.05 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.715.05 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.715.05 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.720.05
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.715.05 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05
The same specification on paper
Same manufacturer
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.715.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720
6 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same manufacturer
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.715.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05
7 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.715.05 or Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.725.05?
According to our database: Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.725.05 has higher module efficiency (23.34% vs 23.02%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.715.05 and Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.725.05?
Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.715.05 has a module efficiency of 23.02%, while Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.725.05 is 23.34%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.715.05 use vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.725.05?
Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.715.05 uses HJT cells; Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.725.05 uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.715.05 and Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.725.05?
Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.715.05 has a 30 years power warranty; Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.725.05 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.715.05 and Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.725.05 bifacial panels?
Both Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.715.05 and Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.725.05 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.