Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-565 vs Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-555
VS
The verdict
565 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.39 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 3 differencesHow alike are they
16
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
3 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
565
555
Difference
Module efficiency
21.87 %
21.48 %
0.39 pp more efficient
Power density
218.7 Wp/m²
214.8 Wp/m²
3.9 Wp/m² higher
Rated power
565 Wp
555 Wp
10 W more power
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.350 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
565
18,459 kWh
555
18,132 kWh
Lifetime gap
327 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
565
555
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
565 W
555 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.8% of rated power
535 W
526 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.5% of rated power
506 W
497 W
Hot roof
70 °C
84.2% of rated power
476 W
468 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
565
555
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
565 Wp
555 Wp
+10 W for 565
Module efficiency
21.87 %
21.48 %
+0.39 pp for 565
Power density
218.7 Wp/m²
214.8 Wp/m²
+3.9 Wp/m² for 565
Open-circuit voltage
50.00 V
49.80 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
42.20 V
42.00 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
14.08 A
13.91 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
13.41 A
13.23 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.350 %/°C
-0.350 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2278x1134x30 mm
2278x1134x30 mm
Same
Module area
2.583 m²
2.583 m²
Same
Weight
32.5 kg
32.5 kg
Same
Weight per kWp
57.5 kg/kWp
58.6 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.50 %/yr
0.50 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
PERC
PERC
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
144
144
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#6,908
vs
#8,152
565 leads by 1,244 places
Power density
#6,841
vs
#8,034
565 leads by 1,193 places
Heat behaviour
#10,419
vs
#10,419
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#11,263
vs
#11,787
565 leads by 524 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#5,723
vs
#6,613
565 leads by 890 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-565 vs Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-560
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-565 vs Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-550
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-565 vs Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-545
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-565 vs Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-540
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-565 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05
15 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-565 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-565 or Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-555?
According to our database: Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-565 has higher module efficiency (21.87% vs 21.48%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-565 and Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-555?
Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-565 has a module efficiency of 21.87%, while Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-555 is 21.48%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-565 use vs Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-555?
Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-565 uses PERC cells; Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-555 uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-565 and Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-555?
Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-565 has a 30 years power warranty; Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-555 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-565 and Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-555 bifacial panels?
Both Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-565 and Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-555 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.
