Skip to main content
540 vs 550 16 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-540 vs Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-550

Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-540
Vikram Solar
PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-540
540 Wp 20.90 % PERC Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-550
Vikram Solar
PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-550
550 Wp 21.29 % PERC Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

550 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.39 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
16 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

3 of 19 parameters
Parameter 540 550 Difference
Module efficiency 20.90 % 21.29 % 0.39 pp more efficient
Power density 209.0 Wp/m² 212.9 Wp/m² 3.9 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 540 Wp 550 Wp 10 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.350 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
540
17,642 kWh
550
17,969 kWh
Lifetime gap
327 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 540 550
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 540 W 550 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.8% of rated power 512 W 521 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.5% of rated power 483 W 492 W
Hot roof 70 °C 84.2% of rated power 455 W 463 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 540 550 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 540 Wp 550 Wp +10 W for 550
Module efficiency 20.90 % 21.29 % +0.39 pp for 550
Power density 209.0 Wp/m² 212.9 Wp/m² +3.9 Wp/m² for 550
Open-circuit voltage 49.50 V 49.70 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 41.70 V 41.90 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 13.64 A 13.82 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 12.96 A 13.14 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.350 %/°C -0.350 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2278x1134x30 mm 2278x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 2.583 m² 2.583 m² Same
Weight 32.5 kg 32.5 kg Same
Weight per kWp 60.2 kg/kWp 59.1 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.50 %/yr 0.50 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology PERC PERC Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 144 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#10,072 vs #8,708
550 leads by 1,364 places
Power density
#10,100 vs #8,497
550 leads by 1,603 places
Heat behaviour
#10,419 vs #10,419
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#12,384 vs #12,010
550 leads by 374 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#7,911 vs #6,996
550 leads by 915 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-540 vs Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-565
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-540 vs Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-560
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-540 vs Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-555
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-540 vs Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-545
One difference: module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-540 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05
15 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-540 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05
15 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-540 or Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-550?
According to our database: Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-550 has higher module efficiency (21.29% vs 20.90%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-540 and Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-550?
Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-540 has a module efficiency of 20.90%, while Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-550 is 21.29%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-540 use vs Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-550?
Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-540 uses PERC cells; Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-550 uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-540 and Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-550?
Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-540 has a 30 years power warranty; Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-550 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-540 and Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-550 bifacial panels?
Both Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-540 and Vikram Solar PARADEA VSMDH.72.AAA.05-550 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.