Skip to main content
AAA.05-710 vs 715.05 17 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-710 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05

Vikram Solar
HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-710
710 Wp 22.86 % N-type Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05
Vikram Solar
HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05
715 Wp 23.02 % N-type Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

AAA.05-710 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.020 %/°C better in heat. 17 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 2 differences
How alike are they
17 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

2 of 19 parameters
Parameter AAA.05-710 715.05 Difference
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.300 %/°C 0.020 %/°C better in heat
Cell count 132 66 66 cells apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
AAA.05-710
23,822 kWh
715.05
23,990 kWh
Lifetime gap
168 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario AAA.05-710 715.05
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 710 W 715 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 680 W 683 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 650 W 651 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 621 W 618 W
03

Full specification

Parameter AAA.05-710 715.05 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 710 Wp 715 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 22.86 % 23.02 % Effectively the same
Power density 228.6 Wp/m² 230.2 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 49.00 V 48.10 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 40.80 V 40.60 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 18.44 A 18.64 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.41 A 17.63 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.300 %/°C +0.020 %/°C for AAA.05-710
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x35 mm Same
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 39.5 kg 39.5 kg Same
Weight per kWp 55.6 kg/kWp 55.2 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology N-type N-type Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 66 66 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#2,536 vs #1,797
715.05 leads by 739 places
Power density
#2,474 vs #2,018
715.05 leads by 456 places
Heat behaviour
#1,309 vs #6,093
AAA.05-710 leads by 4,784 places
Weight
#10,005 vs #9,680
715.05 leads by 325 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#881 vs #721
715.05 leads by 160 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-710 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-710 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-715
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-710 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.710.05
3 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-710 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.705.05
3 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-710 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-705
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-710 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05
6 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-710 or Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05?
According to our database: Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 has higher module efficiency (23.02% vs 22.86%); Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-710 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.280%/°C vs -0.300%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-710 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05?
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-710 has a module efficiency of 22.86%, while Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 is 23.02%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-710 use vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05?
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-710 uses N-type cells; Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-710 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05?
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-710 has a 30 years power warranty; Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-710 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 bifacial panels?
Both Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-710 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.