Skip to main content
725.05 vs AAA.05-720 16 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720

Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05
Vikram Solar
HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05
725 Wp 23.34 % N-type Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Vikram Solar
HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720
720 Wp 23.18 % N-type Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

725.05 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is weight: 2.0 kg lighter. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
16 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

3 of 19 parameters
Parameter 725.05 AAA.05-720 Difference
Weight 37.5 kg 39.5 kg 2.0 kg lighter
Weight per kWp 51.7 kg/kWp 54.9 kg/kWp 3.1 kg/kWp lighter
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.280 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
725.05
24,325 kWh
AAA.05-720
24,157 kWh
Lifetime gap
168 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 725.05 AAA.05-720
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 725 W 720 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.8% of rated power 695 W 690 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.6% of rated power 664 W 660 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.4% of rated power 634 W 629 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 725.05 AAA.05-720 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 725 Wp 720 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 23.34 % 23.18 % Effectively the same
Power density 233.4 Wp/m² 231.8 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 49.60 V 49.40 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 41.40 V 41.20 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 18.56 A 18.52 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.52 A 17.49 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.280 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 37.5 kg 39.5 kg -2.0 kg for 725.05
Weight per kWp 51.7 kg/kWp 54.9 kg/kWp -3.1 kg/kWp for 725.05
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology N-type N-type Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#981 vs #1,468
725.05 leads by 487 places
Power density
#974 vs #1,390
725.05 leads by 416 places
Heat behaviour
#1,347 vs #1,347
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#5,114 vs #9,332
725.05 leads by 4,218 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#402 vs #574
725.05 leads by 172 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.730.05
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.720.05
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.710.05
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.705.05
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 or Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720?
According to our database: Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 has higher module efficiency (23.34% vs 23.18%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720?
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 has a module efficiency of 23.34%, while Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 is 23.18%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 use vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720?
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 uses N-type cells; Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720?
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 has a 30 years power warranty; Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 bifacial panels?
Both Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.