Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-715
VS
Vikram Solar
HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-715
715 Wp
23.02 %
N-type
Bifacial
The verdict
725.05 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.32 pp more efficient. 13 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 6 differencesHow alike are they
13
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
6 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
725.05
AAA.05-715
Difference
Module efficiency
23.34 %
23.02 %
0.32 pp more efficient
Weight
37.5 kg
39.5 kg
2.0 kg lighter
Weight per kWp
51.7 kg/kWp
55.2 kg/kWp
3.5 kg/kWp lighter
Power density
233.4 Wp/m²
230.2 Wp/m²
3.2 Wp/m² higher
Rated power
725 Wp
715 Wp
10 W more power
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
2384x1303x35 mm
2384x1303x33 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.280 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
725.05
24,325 kWh
AAA.05-715
23,990 kWh
Lifetime gap
335 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
725.05
AAA.05-715
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
725 W
715 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.8% of rated power
695 W
685 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.6% of rated power
664 W
655 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.4% of rated power
634 W
625 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
725.05
AAA.05-715
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
725 Wp
715 Wp
+10 W for 725.05
Module efficiency
23.34 %
23.02 %
+0.32 pp for 725.05
Power density
233.4 Wp/m²
230.2 Wp/m²
+3.2 Wp/m² for 725.05
Open-circuit voltage
49.60 V
49.20 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
41.40 V
41.00 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
18.56 A
18.48 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
17.52 A
17.45 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.280 %/°C
-0.280 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
2384x1303x35 mm
2384x1303x33 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
Module area
3.106 m²
3.106 m²
Same
Weight
37.5 kg
39.5 kg
-2.0 kg for 725.05
Weight per kWp
51.7 kg/kWp
55.2 kg/kWp
-3.5 kg/kWp for 725.05
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
N-type
N-type
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#981
vs
#1,847
725.05 leads by 866 places
Power density
#974
vs
#2,070
725.05 leads by 1,096 places
Heat behaviour
#1,347
vs
#1,347
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#5,114
vs
#9,763
725.05 leads by 4,649 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#402
vs
#734
725.05 leads by 332 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.730.05
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.720.05
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.710.05
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.705.05
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 or Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-715?
According to our database: Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 has higher module efficiency (23.34% vs 23.02%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-715?
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 has a module efficiency of 23.34%, while Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-715 is 23.02%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 use vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-715?
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 uses N-type cells; Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-715 uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-715?
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 has a 30 years power warranty; Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-715 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-715 bifacial panels?
Both Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-715 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.
