Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.695.05
VS
The verdict
725.05 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.97 pp more efficient. 9 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 10 differencesHow alike are they
9
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
10 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
725.05
695.05
Difference
Module efficiency
23.34 %
22.37 %
0.97 pp more efficient
Power density
233.4 Wp/m²
223.7 Wp/m²
9.7 Wp/m² higher
Rated power
725 Wp
695 Wp
30 W more power
Temperature coefficient
-0.280 %/°C
-0.300 %/°C
0.020 %/°C better in heat
Weight per kWp
51.7 kg/kWp
56.8 kg/kWp
5.1 kg/kWp lighter
Weight
37.5 kg
39.5 kg
2.0 kg lighter
Open-circuit voltage
49.60 V
47.50 V
2.10 V apart
Cell count
132
66
66 cells apart
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
2384x1303x35 mm
2384x1303x33 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
Voltage at max power
41.40 V
39.90 V
1.50 V apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
725.05
24,325 kWh
695.05
23,319 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,006 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
725.05
695.05
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
725 W
695 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.5% of rated power
695 W
664 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.0% of rated power
664 W
632 W
Hot roof
70 °C
86.5% of rated power
634 W
601 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
725.05
695.05
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
725 Wp
695 Wp
+30 W for 725.05
Module efficiency
23.34 %
22.37 %
+0.97 pp for 725.05
Power density
233.4 Wp/m²
223.7 Wp/m²
+9.7 Wp/m² for 725.05
Open-circuit voltage
49.60 V
47.50 V
2.10 V apart
Voltage at max power
41.40 V
39.90 V
1.50 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.56 A
18.36 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
17.52 A
17.43 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.280 %/°C
-0.300 %/°C
+0.020 %/°C for 725.05
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
2384x1303x35 mm
2384x1303x33 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
Module area
3.106 m²
3.106 m²
Same
Weight
37.5 kg
39.5 kg
-2.0 kg for 725.05
Weight per kWp
51.7 kg/kWp
56.8 kg/kWp
-5.1 kg/kWp for 725.05
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
N-type
N-type
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
66
66 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#981
vs
#5,032
725.05 leads by 4,051 places
Power density
#974
vs
#4,939
725.05 leads by 3,965 places
Heat behaviour
#1,347
vs
#6,152
725.05 leads by 4,805 places
Weight
#5,114
vs
#10,985
725.05 leads by 5,871 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#402
vs
#1,415
725.05 leads by 1,013 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.730.05
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.720.05
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.710.05
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.705.05
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 or Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.695.05?
According to our database: Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 has higher module efficiency (23.34% vs 22.37%); Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.280%/°C vs -0.300%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.695.05?
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 has a module efficiency of 23.34%, while Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.695.05 is 22.37%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 use vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.695.05?
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 uses N-type cells; Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.695.05 uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.695.05?
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 has a 30 years power warranty; Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.695.05 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.695.05 bifacial panels?
Both Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.725.05 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.695.05 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.