Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.710.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-715
VS
Vikram Solar
HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-715
715 Wp
23.02 %
N-type
Bifacial
The verdict
AAA.05-715 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.020 %/°C better in heat. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 3 differencesHow alike are they
16
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
3 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
710.05
AAA.05-715
Difference
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.280 %/°C
0.020 %/°C better in heat
Cell count
66
132
66 cells apart
Open-circuit voltage
48.00 V
49.20 V
1.20 V apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
710.05
23,822 kWh
AAA.05-715
23,990 kWh
Lifetime gap
168 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
710.05
AAA.05-715
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
710 W
715 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.5% of rated power
678 W
685 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.0% of rated power
646 W
655 W
Hot roof
70 °C
86.5% of rated power
614 W
625 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
710.05
AAA.05-715
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
710 Wp
715 Wp
Effectively the same
Module efficiency
22.86 %
23.02 %
Effectively the same
Power density
228.6 Wp/m²
230.2 Wp/m²
Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage
48.00 V
49.20 V
1.20 V apart
Voltage at max power
40.40 V
41.00 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
18.57 A
18.48 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
17.58 A
17.45 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.280 %/°C
+0.020 %/°C for AAA.05-715
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2384x1303x35 mm
Same
Module area
3.106 m²
3.106 m²
Same
Weight
39.5 kg
39.5 kg
Same
Weight per kWp
55.6 kg/kWp
55.2 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
N-type
N-type
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
66
132
66 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#2,536
vs
#1,797
AAA.05-715 leads by 739 places
Power density
#2,474
vs
#2,018
AAA.05-715 leads by 456 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093
vs
#1,309
AAA.05-715 leads by 4,784 places
Weight
#10,005
vs
#9,680
AAA.05-715 leads by 325 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#881
vs
#721
AAA.05-715 leads by 160 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.710.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.710.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.705.05
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.710.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.710.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.695.05
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.710.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.690.05
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-715 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720
The same specification on paper
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.710.05 or Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-715?
According to our database: Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-715 has higher module efficiency (23.02% vs 22.86%); Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-715 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.280%/°C vs -0.300%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.710.05 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-715?
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.710.05 has a module efficiency of 22.86%, while Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-715 is 23.02%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.710.05 use vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-715?
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.710.05 uses N-type cells; Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-715 uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.710.05 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-715?
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.710.05 has a 30 years power warranty; Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-715 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.710.05 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-715 bifacial panels?
Both Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.710.05 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-715 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.
