Skip to main content
UL-715M-132DGN vs TSM156-9-635BNDG 7 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Ulica Solar UL-715M-132DGN vs Ulica Solar TSM156-9-635BNDG

Ulica Solar
UL-715M-132DGN
715 Wp 23.02 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
Ulica Solar
TSM156-9-635BNDG
635 Wp 22.70 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

UL-715M-132DGN leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 80 W more power. 7 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 12 differences
How alike are they
7 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

12 of 19 parameters
Parameter UL-715M-132DGN TSM156-9-635BNDG Difference
Rated power 715 Wp 635 Wp 80 W more power
Product warranty 15 yrs 5 yrs 10 yrs longer
Weight 37.4 kg 33.5 kg 3.9 kg lighter
Module efficiency 23.02 % 22.70 % 0.32 pp more efficient
Open-circuit voltage 48.93 V 56.40 V 7.47 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.42 A 14.33 A 4.09 A apart
Module area 3.106 m² 2.795 m² 0.311 m² apart
Power density 230.2 Wp/m² 227.2 Wp/m² 3.0 Wp/m² higher
Voltage at max power 40.99 V 47.15 V 6.16 V apart
Current at max power 17.44 A 13.48 A 3.96 A apart
Cell count 132 156 24 cells apart
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2465x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2465x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
UL-715M-132DGN
23,990 kWh
TSM156-9-635BNDG
21,306 kWh
Lifetime gap
2,684 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario UL-715M-132DGN TSM156-9-635BNDG
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 715 W 635 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 684 W 607 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 653 W 580 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 622 W 552 W
03

Full specification

Parameter UL-715M-132DGN TSM156-9-635BNDG Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 715 Wp 635 Wp +80 W for UL-715M-132DGN
Module efficiency 23.02 % 22.70 % +0.32 pp for UL-715M-132DGN
Power density 230.2 Wp/m² 227.2 Wp/m² +3.0 Wp/m² for UL-715M-132DGN
Open-circuit voltage 48.93 V 56.40 V 7.47 V apart
Voltage at max power 40.99 V 47.15 V 6.16 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.42 A 14.33 A 4.09 A apart
Current at max power 17.44 A 13.48 A 3.96 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2465x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2465x1134x30 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 2.795 m² 0.311 m² apart
Weight 37.4 kg 33.5 kg -3.9 kg for TSM156-9-635BNDG
Weight per kWp 52.3 kg/kWp 52.8 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 5 yrs +10 yrs for UL-715M-132DGN
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 156 24 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#1,797 vs #3,307
UL-715M-132DGN leads by 1,510 places
Power density
#2,018 vs #3,252
UL-715M-132DGN leads by 1,234 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#5,769 vs #6,429
UL-715M-132DGN leads by 660 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#443 vs #3,758
UL-715M-132DGN leads by 3,315 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Ulica Solar
Ulica Solar UL-715M-132DGN vs Ulica Solar UL-710M-132DGN
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Ulica Solar
Ulica Solar UL-715M-132DGN vs Ulica Solar UL-705M-132DGN
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Ulica Solar
Ulica Solar UL-715M-132DGN vs Ulica Solar UL-700M-132DGN
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Ulica Solar
Ulica Solar TSM156-9-635BNDG vs Ulica Solar TSM156-9-645BNDG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Ulica Solar
Ulica Solar TSM156-9-635BNDG vs Ulica Solar TSM156-9-640BNDG
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Ulica Solar
Ulica Solar TSM156-9-635BNDG vs Ulica Solar TSM156-9-630BNDG
One difference: module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Ulica Solar UL-715M-132DGN or Ulica Solar TSM156-9-635BNDG?
According to our database: Ulica Solar UL-715M-132DGN has higher module efficiency (23.02% vs 22.70%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Ulica Solar UL-715M-132DGN and Ulica Solar TSM156-9-635BNDG?
Ulica Solar UL-715M-132DGN has a module efficiency of 23.02%, while Ulica Solar TSM156-9-635BNDG is 22.70%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Ulica Solar UL-715M-132DGN use vs Ulica Solar TSM156-9-635BNDG?
Ulica Solar UL-715M-132DGN uses TOPCon cells; Ulica Solar TSM156-9-635BNDG uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Ulica Solar UL-715M-132DGN and Ulica Solar TSM156-9-635BNDG?
Ulica Solar UL-715M-132DGN has a 30 years power warranty; Ulica Solar TSM156-9-635BNDG has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Ulica Solar UL-715M-132DGN and Ulica Solar TSM156-9-635BNDG bifacial panels?
Both Ulica Solar UL-715M-132DGN and Ulica Solar TSM156-9-635BNDG are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 8 Ulica Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.