Ulica Solar UL-705M-132DGN vs Ulica Solar UL-495M-120BDGN
VS
The verdict
705M-132DGN leads on the differences that matter
The largest is rated power: 210 W more power. 8 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 11 differencesHow alike are they
8
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
11 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
705M-132DGN
495M-120BDGN
Difference
Rated power
705 Wp
495 Wp
210 W more power
Weight
37.4 kg
26.5 kg
10.9 kg lighter
Module efficiency
22.70 %
22.36 %
0.34 pp more efficient
Open-circuit voltage
48.72 V
43.52 V
5.20 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.36 A
14.43 A
3.93 A apart
Module area
3.106 m²
2.214 m²
0.893 m² apart
Power density
227.0 Wp/m²
223.6 Wp/m²
3.3 Wp/m² higher
Current at max power
17.33 A
13.43 A
3.90 A apart
Cell count
132
120
12 cells apart
Voltage at max power
40.69 V
36.85 V
3.84 V apart
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
1952x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm vs 1952x1134x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
705M-132DGN
23,654 kWh
495M-120BDGN
16,608 kWh
Lifetime gap
7,046 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
705M-132DGN
495M-120BDGN
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
705 W
495 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
674 W
473 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
644 W
452 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
613 W
430 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
705M-132DGN
495M-120BDGN
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
705 Wp
495 Wp
+210 W for 705M-132DGN
Module efficiency
22.70 %
22.36 %
+0.34 pp for 705M-132DGN
Power density
227.0 Wp/m²
223.6 Wp/m²
+3.3 Wp/m² for 705M-132DGN
Open-circuit voltage
48.72 V
43.52 V
5.20 V apart
Voltage at max power
40.69 V
36.85 V
3.84 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.36 A
14.43 A
3.93 A apart
Current at max power
17.33 A
13.43 A
3.90 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
1952x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm vs 1952x1134x30 mm
Module area
3.106 m²
2.214 m²
0.893 m² apart
Weight
37.4 kg
26.5 kg
-10.9 kg for 495M-120BDGN
Weight per kWp
53.0 kg/kWp
53.5 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
15 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
120
12 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#3,307
vs
#5,007
705M-132DGN leads by 1,700 places
Power density
#3,361
vs
#4,950
705M-132DGN leads by 1,589 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#6,803
vs
#7,516
705M-132DGN leads by 713 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#738
vs
#6,963
705M-132DGN leads by 6,225 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Ulica Solar
Ulica Solar UL-705M-132DGN vs Ulica Solar UL-715M-132DGN
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Ulica Solar
Ulica Solar UL-705M-132DGN vs Ulica Solar UL-710M-132DGN
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Ulica Solar
Ulica Solar UL-705M-132DGN vs Ulica Solar UL-700M-132DGN
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Ulica Solar
Ulica Solar UL-495M-120BDGN vs Ulica Solar UL-505M-120BDGN
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Ulica Solar
Ulica Solar UL-495M-120BDGN vs Ulica Solar UL-500M-120BDGN
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Ulica Solar
Ulica Solar UL-495M-120BDGN vs Ulica Solar UL-490M-120BDGN
One difference: module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Ulica Solar UL-705M-132DGN or Ulica Solar UL-495M-120BDGN?
According to our database: Ulica Solar UL-705M-132DGN has higher module efficiency (22.70% vs 22.36%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Ulica Solar UL-705M-132DGN and Ulica Solar UL-495M-120BDGN?
Ulica Solar UL-705M-132DGN has a module efficiency of 22.70%, while Ulica Solar UL-495M-120BDGN is 22.36%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Ulica Solar UL-705M-132DGN use vs Ulica Solar UL-495M-120BDGN?
Ulica Solar UL-705M-132DGN uses TOPCon cells; Ulica Solar UL-495M-120BDGN uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Ulica Solar UL-705M-132DGN and Ulica Solar UL-495M-120BDGN?
Ulica Solar UL-705M-132DGN has a 30 years power warranty; Ulica Solar UL-495M-120BDGN has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Ulica Solar UL-705M-132DGN and Ulica Solar UL-495M-120BDGN bifacial panels?
Both Ulica Solar UL-705M-132DGN and Ulica Solar UL-495M-120BDGN are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 7 Ulica Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.