Skip to main content
TWMHF-66HD730X vs TWMNH-66HD615 5 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Tongwei TWMHF-66HD730X vs Tongwei TWMNH-66HD615

TWMHF-66HD730X
730 Wp 23.50 % N-type Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
TWMNH-66HD615
615 Wp 22.80 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

TWMHF-66HD730X leads on the differences that matter

The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.040 %/°C better in heat. 5 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 14 differences
How alike are they
5 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

14 of 19 parameters
Parameter TWMHF-66HD730X TWMNH-66HD615 Difference
Temperature coefficient -0.240 %/°C -0.280 %/°C 0.040 %/°C better in heat
Module efficiency 23.50 % 22.80 % 0.70 pp more efficient
Rated power 730 Wp 615 Wp 115 W more power
Weight 37.0 kg 32.5 kg 4.5 kg lighter
Power density 235.0 Wp/m² 227.7 Wp/m² 7.3 Wp/m² higher
Product warranty 15 yrs 12 yrs 3 yrs longer
Short-circuit current 18.28 A 16.00 A 2.28 A apart
Module area 3.106 m² 2.701 m² 0.405 m² apart
Cell technology N-type TOPCon N-type vs TOPCon
Current at max power 17.33 A 15.13 A 2.20 A apart
Weight per kWp 50.7 kg/kWp 52.8 kg/kWp 2.2 kg/kWp lighter
Open-circuit voltage 50.46 V 48.90 V 1.56 V apart
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2382x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
Voltage at max power 42.13 V 40.65 V 1.48 V apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
TWMHF-66HD730X
24,588 kWh
TWMNH-66HD615
20,634 kWh
Lifetime gap
3,954 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario TWMHF-66HD730X TWMNH-66HD615
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 730 W 615 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.8% of rated power 704 W 589 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.6% of rated power 677 W 563 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.4% of rated power 651 W 538 W
03

Full specification

Parameter TWMHF-66HD730X TWMNH-66HD615 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 730 Wp 615 Wp +115 W for TWMHF-66HD730X
Module efficiency 23.50 % 22.80 % +0.70 pp for TWMHF-66HD730X
Power density 235.0 Wp/m² 227.7 Wp/m² +7.3 Wp/m² for TWMHF-66HD730X
Open-circuit voltage 50.46 V 48.90 V 1.56 V apart
Voltage at max power 42.13 V 40.65 V 1.48 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.28 A 16.00 A 2.28 A apart
Current at max power 17.33 A 15.13 A 2.20 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.240 %/°C -0.280 %/°C +0.040 %/°C for TWMHF-66HD730X
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2382x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 2.701 m² 0.405 m² apart
Weight 37.0 kg 32.5 kg -4.5 kg for TWMNH-66HD615
Weight per kWp 50.7 kg/kWp 52.8 kg/kWp -2.2 kg/kWp for TWMHF-66HD730X
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 12 yrs +3 yrs for TWMHF-66HD730X
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.38 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Effectively the same
Technology
Cell technology N-type TOPCon N-type vs TOPCon
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#716 vs #2,714
TWMHF-66HD730X leads by 1,998 places
Power density
#800 vs #3,077
TWMHF-66HD730X leads by 2,277 places
Heat behaviour
#13 vs #1,309
TWMHF-66HD730X leads by 1,296 places
Weight
#4,111 vs #6,546
TWMHF-66HD730X leads by 2,435 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#196 vs #2,879
TWMHF-66HD730X leads by 2,683 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TWMHF-66HD730X vs Tongwei TWMHF-66HD740X
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TWMHF-66HD730X vs Tongwei TWMHF-66HD735X
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TWMHF-66HD730X vs Tongwei TWMHF-66HD725X
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TWMHF-66HD730X vs Tongwei TWMHF-66HD720X
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TWMHF-66HD730X vs Tongwei TWMHF-66HD715X
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TWMNH-66HD615 vs Tongwei TWMNF-66HD750
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Tongwei TWMHF-66HD730X or Tongwei TWMNH-66HD615?
According to our database: Tongwei TWMHF-66HD730X has higher module efficiency (23.50% vs 22.80%); Tongwei TWMHF-66HD730X tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.240%/°C vs -0.280%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Tongwei TWMHF-66HD730X and Tongwei TWMNH-66HD615?
Tongwei TWMHF-66HD730X has a module efficiency of 23.50%, while Tongwei TWMNH-66HD615 is 22.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Tongwei TWMHF-66HD730X use vs Tongwei TWMNH-66HD615?
Tongwei TWMHF-66HD730X uses N-type cells; Tongwei TWMNH-66HD615 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Tongwei TWMHF-66HD730X and Tongwei TWMNH-66HD615?
Tongwei TWMHF-66HD730X has a 30 years power warranty; Tongwei TWMNH-66HD615 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Tongwei TWMHF-66HD730X and Tongwei TWMNH-66HD615 bifacial panels?
Both Tongwei TWMHF-66HD730X and Tongwei TWMNH-66HD615 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 59 Tongwei offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.