Skip to main content
635 vs 625 16 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-635 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-625

Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-635
TSM-NEG19RC.70-635
635 Wp 23.50 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-625
TSM-NEG19RC.70-625
625 Wp 23.10 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

635 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.40 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
16 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

3 of 19 parameters
Parameter 635 625 Difference
Module efficiency 23.50 % 23.10 % 0.40 pp more efficient
Power density 235.1 Wp/m² 231.4 Wp/m² 3.7 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 635 Wp 625 Wp 10 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
635
21,306 kWh
625
20,970 kWh
Lifetime gap
336 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 635 625
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 635 W 625 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 607 W 598 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 580 W 571 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 552 W 543 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 635 625 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 635 Wp 625 Wp +10 W for 635
Module efficiency 23.50 % 23.10 % +0.40 pp for 635
Power density 235.1 Wp/m² 231.4 Wp/m² +3.7 Wp/m² for 635
Open-circuit voltage 49.10 V 48.70 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 40.84 V 40.46 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 16.44 A 16.32 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 15.55 A 15.45 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 2382x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 2.701 m² 2.701 m² Same
Weight 33.0 kg 33.0 kg Same
Weight per kWp 52.0 kg/kWp 52.8 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#716 vs #1,570
635 leads by 854 places
Power density
#741 vs #1,513
635 leads by 772 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#5,408 vs #6,476
635 leads by 1,068 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,750 vs #2,270
635 leads by 520 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-635 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-640
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-635 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-630
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-635 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-620
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-635 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-615
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-635 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-635 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-635 or Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-625?
According to our database: Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-635 has higher module efficiency (23.50% vs 23.10%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-635 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-625?
Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-635 has a module efficiency of 23.50%, while Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-625 is 23.10%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-635 use vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-625?
Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-635 uses TOPCon cells; Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-625 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-635 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-625?
Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-635 has a 30 years power warranty; Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-625 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-635 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-625 bifacial panels?
Both Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-635 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.70-625 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 248 Trina Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.