Skip to main content
635NEG19RC.20 vs NEG21C.20Q-750 6 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Trina Solar TSM-635NEG19RC.20 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750

Trina Solar TSM-635NEG19RC.20
TSM-635NEG19RC.20
635 Wp 23.50 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750
TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750
750 Wp 24.10 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

NEG21C.20Q-750 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 115 W more power. 6 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 13 differences
How alike are they
6 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

13 of 19 parameters
Parameter 635NEG19RC.20 NEG21C.20Q-750 Difference
Rated power 635 Wp 750 Wp 115 W more power
Module efficiency 23.50 % 24.10 % 0.60 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.260 %/°C 0.030 %/°C better in heat
Weight 33.0 kg 38.3 kg 5.3 kg lighter
Power density 235.1 Wp/m² 241.4 Wp/m² 6.4 Wp/m² higher
Short-circuit current 16.44 A 18.77 A 2.33 A apart
Module area 2.701 m² 3.106 m² 0.405 m² apart
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.35 %/yr 0.05 %/yr slower
Current at max power 15.55 A 17.66 A 2.11 A apart
Cell count 132 264 132 cells apart
Open-circuit voltage 49.10 V 50.50 V 1.40 V apart
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2382x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Voltage at max power 40.84 V 42.50 V 1.66 V apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
635NEG19RC.20
21,306 kWh
NEG21C.20Q-750
25,360 kWh
Lifetime gap
4,054 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 635NEG19RC.20 NEG21C.20Q-750
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 635 W 750 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 607 W 721 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 580 W 692 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 552 W 662 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 635NEG19RC.20 NEG21C.20Q-750 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 635 Wp 750 Wp +115 W for NEG21C.20Q-750
Module efficiency 23.50 % 24.10 % +0.60 pp for NEG21C.20Q-750
Power density 235.1 Wp/m² 241.4 Wp/m² +6.4 Wp/m² for NEG21C.20Q-750
Open-circuit voltage 49.10 V 50.50 V 1.40 V apart
Voltage at max power 40.84 V 42.50 V 1.66 V apart
Short-circuit current 16.44 A 18.77 A 2.33 A apart
Current at max power 15.55 A 17.66 A 2.11 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.260 %/°C +0.030 %/°C for NEG21C.20Q-750
Mechanical
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2382x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area 2.701 m² 3.106 m² 0.405 m² apart
Weight 33.0 kg 38.3 kg -5.3 kg for 635NEG19RC.20
Weight per kWp 52.0 kg/kWp 51.1 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.35 %/yr -0.05 %/yr for NEG21C.20Q-750
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 264 132 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#716 vs #219
NEG21C.20Q-750 leads by 497 places
Power density
#741 vs #219
NEG21C.20Q-750 leads by 522 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #511
NEG21C.20Q-750 leads by 1,654 places
Weight
#5,408 vs #4,401
NEG21C.20Q-750 leads by 1,007 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,750 vs #123
NEG21C.20Q-750 leads by 1,627 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-635NEG19RC.20 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-635NEG19RC.20 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-635NEG19RC.20 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745
13 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-635NEG19RC.20 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740
10 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-635NEG19RC.20 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740
10 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-635NEG19RC.20 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740
13 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Trina Solar TSM-635NEG19RC.20 or Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750?
According to our database: Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750 has higher module efficiency (24.10% vs 23.50%); Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Trina Solar TSM-635NEG19RC.20 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750?
Trina Solar TSM-635NEG19RC.20 has a module efficiency of 23.50%, while Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750 is 24.10%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Trina Solar TSM-635NEG19RC.20 use vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750?
Trina Solar TSM-635NEG19RC.20 uses TOPCon cells; Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Trina Solar TSM-635NEG19RC.20 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750?
Trina Solar TSM-635NEG19RC.20 has a 30 years power warranty; Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Trina Solar TSM-635NEG19RC.20 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750 bifacial panels?
Both Trina Solar TSM-635NEG19RC.20 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 248 Trina Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.