Skip to main content
460 NEG9R.28 vs NEG18RC.27-510 9 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Trina Solar TSM-460 NEG9R.28 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG18RC.27-510

Trina Solar TSM-460 NEG9R.28
TSM-460 NEG9R.28
460 Wp 23.00 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
Trina Solar TSM-NEG18RC.27-510
TSM-NEG18RC.27-510
510 Wp 22.90 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

10 differences, and they point both ways

The largest is rated power: 50 W more power. 9 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 10 differences
How alike are they
9 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

10 of 19 parameters
Parameter 460 NEG9R.28 NEG18RC.27-510 Difference
Rated power 460 Wp 510 Wp 50 W more power
Product warranty 25 yrs 15 yrs 10 yrs longer
Open-circuit voltage 53.80 V 40.60 V 13.20 V apart
Short-circuit current 10.81 A 15.93 A 5.12 A apart
Module area 1.998 m² 2.224 m² 0.226 m² apart
Weight 21.0 kg 23.5 kg 2.5 kg lighter
Voltage at max power 45.40 V 33.70 V 11.70 V apart
Current at max power 10.14 A 15.14 A 5.00 A apart
Cell count 144 108 36 cells apart
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 1961x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm vs 1961x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
460 NEG9R.28
15,434 kWh
NEG18RC.27-510
17,112 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,678 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 460 NEG9R.28 NEG18RC.27-510
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 460 W 510 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 440 W 488 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 420 W 466 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 400 W 443 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 460 NEG9R.28 NEG18RC.27-510 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 460 Wp 510 Wp +50 W for NEG18RC.27-510
Module efficiency 23.00 % 22.90 % Effectively the same
Power density 230.2 Wp/m² 229.3 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 53.80 V 40.60 V 13.20 V apart
Voltage at max power 45.40 V 33.70 V 11.70 V apart
Short-circuit current 10.81 A 15.93 A 5.12 A apart
Current at max power 10.14 A 15.14 A 5.00 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 1961x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm vs 1961x1134x30 mm
Module area 1.998 m² 2.224 m² 0.226 m² apart
Weight 21.0 kg 23.5 kg -2.5 kg for 460 NEG9R.28
Weight per kWp 45.7 kg/kWp 46.1 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 25 yrs 15 yrs +10 yrs for 460 NEG9R.28
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 108 36 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#1,919 vs #2,359
460 NEG9R.28 leads by 440 places
Power density
#1,876 vs #2,343
460 NEG9R.28 leads by 467 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#805 vs #979
460 NEG9R.28 leads by 174 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#5,126 vs #5,606
460 NEG9R.28 leads by 480 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-460 NEG9R.28 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.20-520
13 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-460 NEG9R.28 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.28-520
13 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-460 NEG9R.28 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG18RC.27-515
11 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-460 NEG9R.28 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.20-515
12 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-460 NEG9R.28 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.28-515
12 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-460 NEG9R.28 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.25-515
12 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Trina Solar TSM-460 NEG9R.28 or Trina Solar TSM-NEG18RC.27-510?
According to our database: Trina Solar TSM-460 NEG9R.28 has higher module efficiency (23.00% vs 22.90%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Trina Solar TSM-460 NEG9R.28 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG18RC.27-510?
Trina Solar TSM-460 NEG9R.28 has a module efficiency of 23.00%, while Trina Solar TSM-NEG18RC.27-510 is 22.90%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Trina Solar TSM-460 NEG9R.28 use vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG18RC.27-510?
Trina Solar TSM-460 NEG9R.28 uses TOPCon cells; Trina Solar TSM-NEG18RC.27-510 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Trina Solar TSM-460 NEG9R.28 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG18RC.27-510?
Trina Solar TSM-460 NEG9R.28 has a 30 years power warranty; Trina Solar TSM-NEG18RC.27-510 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Trina Solar TSM-460 NEG9R.28 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG18RC.27-510 bifacial panels?
Both Trina Solar TSM-460 NEG9R.28 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG18RC.27-510 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 248 Trina Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.