Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.20-650 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.20Q
VS
The verdict
20Q leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.70 pp more efficient. 12 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 7 differencesHow alike are they
12
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
7 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
20-650
20Q
Difference
Module efficiency
24.10 %
24.80 %
0.70 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
0.030 %/°C better in heat
Power density
240.6 Wp/m²
248.0 Wp/m²
7.4 Wp/m² higher
Rated power
650 Wp
670 Wp
20 W more power
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.35 %/yr
0.05 %/yr slower
Cell count
132
264
132 cells apart
Open-circuit voltage
49.77 V
50.95 V
1.18 V apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
20-650
21,809 kWh
20Q
22,655 kWh
Lifetime gap
846 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
20-650
20Q
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
650 W
670 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
622 W
644 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
593 W
618 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
565 W
592 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
20-650
20Q
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
650 Wp
670 Wp
+20 W for 20Q
Module efficiency
24.10 %
24.80 %
+0.70 pp for 20Q
Power density
240.6 Wp/m²
248.0 Wp/m²
+7.4 Wp/m² for 20Q
Open-circuit voltage
49.77 V
50.95 V
1.18 V apart
Voltage at max power
41.43 V
42.04 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
16.59 A
16.60 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
15.69 A
15.94 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
+0.030 %/°C for 20Q
Mechanical
Dimensions
2382x1134x30 mm
2382x1134x30 mm
Same
Module area
2.701 m²
2.701 m²
Same
Weight
33.0 kg
33.0 kg
Same
Weight per kWp
50.8 kg/kWp
49.3 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.35 %/yr
-0.05 %/yr for 20Q
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
264
132 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#219
vs
#12
20Q leads by 207 places
Power density
#233
vs
#14
20Q leads by 219 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#511
20Q leads by 1,654 places
Weight
#4,190
vs
#2,825
20Q leads by 1,365 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,158
vs
#490
20Q leads by 668 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.20-650 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.20-645
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.20-650 vs Trina Solar TSM-NED19RC.20
3 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.20-650 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.20-640
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.20-650 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.20-635
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.20-650 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG19R.20-635
8 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.20-650 vs Trina Solar TSM-635NEG19RC.20
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.20-650 or Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.20Q?
According to our database: Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.20Q has higher module efficiency (24.80% vs 24.10%); Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.20Q tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.20-650 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.20Q?
Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.20-650 has a module efficiency of 24.10%, while Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.20Q is 24.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.20-650 use vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.20Q?
Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.20-650 uses TOPCon cells; Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.20Q uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.20-650 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.20Q?
Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.20-650 has a 30 years power warranty; Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.20Q has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.20-650 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.20Q bifacial panels?
Both Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.20-650 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.20Q are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 250 Trina Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.
