Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.20-515 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740
VS
The verdict
14 differences, and they point both ways
The largest is rated power: 225 W more power. 5 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 14 differencesHow alike are they
5
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
14 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
NEG18R.20-515
NEG21C.20 740
Difference
Rated power
515 Wp
740 Wp
225 W more power
Module efficiency
23.20 %
23.80 %
0.60 pp more efficient
Weight
23.5 kg
38.3 kg
14.8 kg lighter
Weight per kWp
45.6 kg/kWp
51.8 kg/kWp
6.1 kg/kWp lighter
Product warranty
15 yrs
12 yrs
3 yrs longer
Power density
231.6 Wp/m²
238.2 Wp/m²
6.6 Wp/m² higher
Open-circuit voltage
40.90 V
50.30 V
9.40 V apart
Short-circuit current
15.96 A
18.66 A
2.70 A apart
Module area
2.224 m²
3.106 m²
0.883 m² apart
Voltage at max power
33.90 V
42.10 V
8.20 V apart
Current at max power
15.20 A
17.58 A
2.38 A apart
Cell count
108
132
24 cells apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
Dimensions
1961x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
1961x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
NEG18R.20-515
17,279 kWh
NEG21C.20 740
24,828 kWh
Lifetime gap
7,549 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
NEG18R.20-515
NEG21C.20 740
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
515 W
740 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
493 W
708 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
470 W
676 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
448 W
643 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
NEG18R.20-515
NEG21C.20 740
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
515 Wp
740 Wp
+225 W for NEG21C.20 740
Module efficiency
23.20 %
23.80 %
+0.60 pp for NEG21C.20 740
Power density
231.6 Wp/m²
238.2 Wp/m²
+6.6 Wp/m² for NEG21C.20 740
Open-circuit voltage
40.90 V
50.30 V
9.40 V apart
Voltage at max power
33.90 V
42.10 V
8.20 V apart
Short-circuit current
15.96 A
18.66 A
2.70 A apart
Current at max power
15.20 A
17.58 A
2.38 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
1961x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
1961x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area
2.224 m²
3.106 m²
0.883 m² apart
Weight
23.5 kg
38.3 kg
-14.8 kg for NEG18R.20-515
Weight per kWp
45.6 kg/kWp
51.8 kg/kWp
-6.1 kg/kWp for NEG18R.20-515
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
12 yrs
+3 yrs for NEG18R.20-515
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
108
132
24 cells apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,306
vs
#433
NEG21C.20 740 leads by 873 places
Power density
#1,473
vs
#431
NEG21C.20 740 leads by 1,042 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#789
vs
#5,125
NEG18R.20-515 leads by 4,336 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#5,086
vs
#185
NEG21C.20 740 leads by 4,901 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.20-515 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.20-520
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755
6 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750
6 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745
4 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740
The same specification on paper
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.20-515 or Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740?
According to our database: Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740 has higher module efficiency (23.80% vs 23.20%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.20-515 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740?
Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.20-515 has a module efficiency of 23.20%, while Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740 is 23.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.20-515 use vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740?
Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.20-515 uses TOPCon cells; Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.20-515 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740?
Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.20-515 has a 30 years power warranty; Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.20-515 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740 bifacial panels?
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740 is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.20-515 is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 248 Trina Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

