Trina Solar TSM-DE19R-585 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760
VS
The verdict
NEG21C.20Q-760 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 2.80 pp more efficient. 2 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 17 differencesHow alike are they
2
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
17 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
DE19R-585
NEG21C.20Q-760
Difference
Module efficiency
21.70 %
24.50 %
2.80 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient
-0.340 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
0.080 %/°C better in heat
Rated power
585 Wp
760 Wp
175 W more power
Power density
216.6 Wp/m²
244.7 Wp/m²
28.1 Wp/m² higher
Performance warranty
25 yrs
30 yrs
5 yrs longer
Annual degradation
0.55 %/yr
0.35 %/yr
0.20 %/yr slower
Weight
28.1 kg
38.3 kg
10.2 kg lighter
Open-circuit voltage
46.60 V
50.90 V
4.30 V apart
Short-circuit current
15.99 A
18.85 A
2.86 A apart
Module area
2.701 m²
3.106 m²
0.405 m² apart
Cell technology
PERC
TOPCon
PERC vs TOPCon
Current at max power
14.90 A
17.72 A
2.82 A apart
Cell count
132
264
132 cells apart
Voltage at max power
39.30 V
42.90 V
3.60 V apart
Weight per kWp
48.0 kg/kWp
50.4 kg/kWp
2.4 kg/kWp lighter
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
Dimensions
2382x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
2382x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
DE19R-585
18,959 kWh
NEG21C.20Q-760
25,698 kWh
Lifetime gap
6,739 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
DE19R-585
NEG21C.20Q-760
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
585 W
760 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.9% of rated power
555 W
730 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.8% of rated power
525 W
701 W
Hot roof
70 °C
84.7% of rated power
495 W
671 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
DE19R-585
NEG21C.20Q-760
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
585 Wp
760 Wp
+175 W for NEG21C.20Q-760
Module efficiency
21.70 %
24.50 %
+2.80 pp for NEG21C.20Q-760
Power density
216.6 Wp/m²
244.7 Wp/m²
+28.1 Wp/m² for NEG21C.20Q-760
Open-circuit voltage
46.60 V
50.90 V
4.30 V apart
Voltage at max power
39.30 V
42.90 V
3.60 V apart
Short-circuit current
15.99 A
18.85 A
2.86 A apart
Current at max power
14.90 A
17.72 A
2.82 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.340 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
+0.080 %/°C for NEG21C.20Q-760
Mechanical
Dimensions
2382x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
2382x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area
2.701 m²
3.106 m²
0.405 m² apart
Weight
28.1 kg
38.3 kg
-10.2 kg for DE19R-585
Weight per kWp
48.0 kg/kWp
50.4 kg/kWp
-2.4 kg/kWp for DE19R-585
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
25 yrs
30 yrs
+5 yrs for NEG21C.20Q-760
Annual degradation
0.55 %/yr
0.35 %/yr
-0.20 %/yr for NEG21C.20Q-760
Technology
Cell technology
PERC
TOPCon
PERC vs TOPCon
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
264
132 cells apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#7,485
vs
#82
NEG21C.20Q-760 leads by 7,403 places
Power density
#7,645
vs
#98
NEG21C.20Q-760 leads by 7,547 places
Heat behaviour
#8,846
vs
#515
NEG21C.20Q-760 leads by 8,331 places
Weight
#2,027
vs
#3,797
DE19R-585 leads by 1,770 places
Warranty
#9,912
vs
#21
NEG21C.20Q-760 leads by 9,891 places
Overall
#6,183
vs
#66
NEG21C.20Q-760 leads by 6,117 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-DE19R-585 vs Trina Solar TSM-DE19R-580
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-DE19R-585 vs Trina Solar TSM-DE19R-575
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-DE19R-585 vs Trina Solar TSM-DE19R-570
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-DE19R-585 vs Trina Solar TSM-DE19R-565
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Trina Solar TSM-DE19R-585 or Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760?
According to our database: Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 has higher module efficiency (24.50% vs 21.70%); Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.340%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Trina Solar TSM-DE19R-585 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760?
Trina Solar TSM-DE19R-585 has a module efficiency of 21.70%, while Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 is 24.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Trina Solar TSM-DE19R-585 use vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760?
Trina Solar TSM-DE19R-585 uses PERC cells; Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Trina Solar TSM-DE19R-585 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760?
Trina Solar TSM-DE19R-585 has a 25 years power warranty; Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Trina Solar TSM-DE19R-585 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 bifacial panels?
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Trina Solar TSM-DE19R-585 is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 189 Trina Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

