Tongwei TNC M10-72 Monofacial vs Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial
VS
The verdict
THC G12-66 Bifacial leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.80 pp more efficient. 4 of 17 comparable parameters are identical, with 2 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish them.
See all 13 differencesHow alike are they
4
of 17 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
13 of 17 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
TNC M10-72 Monofacial
THC G12-66 Bifacial
Difference
Module efficiency
23.00 %
23.80 %
0.80 pp more efficient
Rated power
595 Wp
740 Wp
145 W more power
Weight
31.5 kg
37.0 kg
5.5 kg lighter
Power density
230.3 Wp/m²
238.2 Wp/m²
7.9 Wp/m² higher
Product warranty
12 yrs
15 yrs
3 yrs longer
Short-circuit current
14.15 A
18.47 A
4.32 A apart
Module area
2.583 m²
3.106 m²
0.523 m² apart
Open-circuit voltage
53.20 V
50.62 V
2.58 V apart
Weight per kWp
52.9 kg/kWp
50.0 kg/kWp
2.9 kg/kWp lighter
Current at max power
13.40 A
17.49 A
4.09 A apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
Voltage at max power
44.41 V
42.32 V
2.09 V apart
Dimensions
2278x1134 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
2278x1134 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.280 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
TNC M10-72 Monofacial
19,963 kWh
THC G12-66 Bifacial
24,828 kWh
Lifetime gap
4,865 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
TNC M10-72 Monofacial
THC G12-66 Bifacial
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
595 W
740 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.8% of rated power
570 W
709 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.6% of rated power
545 W
678 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.4% of rated power
520 W
647 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
TNC M10-72 Monofacial
THC G12-66 Bifacial
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
595 Wp
740 Wp
+145 W for THC G12-66 Bifacial
Module efficiency
23.00 %
23.80 %
+0.80 pp for THC G12-66 Bifacial
Power density
230.3 Wp/m²
238.2 Wp/m²
+7.9 Wp/m² for THC G12-66 Bifacial
Open-circuit voltage
53.20 V
50.62 V
2.58 V apart
Voltage at max power
44.41 V
42.32 V
2.09 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.15 A
18.47 A
4.32 A apart
Current at max power
13.40 A
17.49 A
4.09 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.280 %/°C
-0.280 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2278x1134 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
2278x1134 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area
2.583 m²
3.106 m²
0.523 m² apart
Weight
31.5 kg
37.0 kg
-5.5 kg for TNC M10-72 Monofacial
Weight per kWp
52.9 kg/kWp
50.0 kg/kWp
-2.9 kg/kWp for THC G12-66 Bifacial
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
15 yrs
+3 yrs for THC G12-66 Bifacial
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
-
Not published by Tongwei
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
-
132
Not published by Tongwei
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,970
vs
#462
THC G12-66 Bifacial leads by 1,508 places
Power density
#1,809
vs
#460
THC G12-66 Bifacial leads by 1,349 places
Heat behaviour
#1,347
vs
#1,347
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#6,715
vs
#3,329
THC G12-66 Bifacial leads by 3,386 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3,400
vs
#130
THC G12-66 Bifacial leads by 3,270 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TNC M10-72 Monofacial vs Tongwei TWMNF-66HD
10 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TNC M10-72 Monofacial vs Tongwei TNC G12-66 Monofacial
8 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TNC M10-72 Monofacial vs Tongwei TNC G12-66 Bifacial
10 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TNC M10-72 Monofacial vs Tongwei TNC M10-78 Bifacial
8 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TNC M10-72 Monofacial vs Tongwei TWMNH-66HS
11 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TNC M10-72 Monofacial vs Tongwei TWMNH-66HD
11 differences, the largest is rated power
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Tongwei TNC M10-72 Monofacial or Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial?
According to our database: Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial has higher module efficiency (23.80% vs 23.00%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Tongwei TNC M10-72 Monofacial and Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial?
Tongwei TNC M10-72 Monofacial has a module efficiency of 23.00%, while Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial is 23.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Tongwei TNC M10-72 Monofacial use vs Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial?
Tongwei TNC M10-72 Monofacial uses TOPCon cells; Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Tongwei TNC M10-72 Monofacial and Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial?
Tongwei TNC M10-72 Monofacial has a 30 years power warranty; Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Tongwei TNC M10-72 Monofacial and Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial bifacial panels?
Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Tongwei TNC M10-72 Monofacial is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 58 Tongwei offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.