Skip to main content
TNC M10-72 Monofacial vs TWMNF-66HD725 7 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

Tongwei TNC M10-72 Monofacial vs Tongwei TWMNF-66HD725

TNC M10-72 Monofacial
595 Wp 23.00 % TOPCon
VS
Tongwei TWMNF-66HD725
TWMNF-66HD725
725 Wp 23.30 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

TWMNF-66HD725 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 130 W more power. 7 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 11 differences
How alike are they
7 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

11 of 18 parameters
Parameter TNC M10-72 Monofacial TWMNF-66HD725 Difference
Rated power 595 Wp 725 Wp 130 W more power
Weight 31.5 kg 37.9 kg 6.4 kg lighter
Short-circuit current 14.15 A 18.60 A 4.45 A apart
Module area 2.583 m² 3.106 m² 0.523 m² apart
Module efficiency 23.00 % 23.30 % 0.30 pp more efficient
Open-circuit voltage 53.20 V 49.45 V 3.75 V apart
Power density 230.3 Wp/m² 233.4 Wp/m² 3.1 Wp/m² higher
Current at max power 13.40 A 17.60 A 4.20 A apart
Voltage at max power 44.41 V 41.20 V 3.21 V apart
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
Dimensions 2278x1134 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2278x1134 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.280 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
TNC M10-72 Monofacial
19,963 kWh
TWMNF-66HD725
24,325 kWh
Lifetime gap
4,362 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario TNC M10-72 Monofacial TWMNF-66HD725
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 595 W 725 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.8% of rated power 570 W 695 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.6% of rated power 545 W 664 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.4% of rated power 520 W 634 W
03

Full specification

Parameter TNC M10-72 Monofacial TWMNF-66HD725 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 595 Wp 725 Wp +130 W for TWMNF-66HD725
Module efficiency 23.00 % 23.30 % +0.30 pp for TWMNF-66HD725
Power density 230.3 Wp/m² 233.4 Wp/m² +3.1 Wp/m² for TWMNF-66HD725
Open-circuit voltage 53.20 V 49.45 V 3.75 V apart
Voltage at max power 44.41 V 41.20 V 3.21 V apart
Short-circuit current 14.15 A 18.60 A 4.45 A apart
Current at max power 13.40 A 17.60 A 4.20 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.280 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2278x1134 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2278x1134 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area 2.583 m² 3.106 m² 0.523 m² apart
Weight 31.5 kg 37.9 kg -6.4 kg for TNC M10-72 Monofacial
Weight per kWp 52.9 kg/kWp 52.3 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count - 132 Not published by Tongwei
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#1,970 vs #1,057
TWMNF-66HD725 leads by 913 places
Power density
#1,809 vs #974
TWMNF-66HD725 leads by 835 places
Heat behaviour
#1,347 vs #1,347
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#6,715 vs #5,799
TWMNF-66HD725 leads by 916 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3,400 vs #431
TWMNF-66HD725 leads by 2,969 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TNC M10-72 Monofacial vs Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TNC M10-72 Monofacial vs Tongwei TWMNF-66HD
10 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TNC M10-72 Monofacial vs Tongwei TNC G12-66 Monofacial
8 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TNC M10-72 Monofacial vs Tongwei TNC G12-66 Bifacial
10 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TNC M10-72 Monofacial vs Tongwei TNC M10-78 Bifacial
8 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TNC M10-72 Monofacial vs Tongwei TWMNH-66HS
11 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Tongwei TNC M10-72 Monofacial or Tongwei TWMNF-66HD725?
According to our database: Tongwei TWMNF-66HD725 has higher module efficiency (23.30% vs 23.00%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Tongwei TNC M10-72 Monofacial and Tongwei TWMNF-66HD725?
Tongwei TNC M10-72 Monofacial has a module efficiency of 23.00%, while Tongwei TWMNF-66HD725 is 23.30%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Tongwei TNC M10-72 Monofacial use vs Tongwei TWMNF-66HD725?
Tongwei TNC M10-72 Monofacial uses TOPCon cells; Tongwei TWMNF-66HD725 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Tongwei TNC M10-72 Monofacial and Tongwei TWMNF-66HD725?
Tongwei TNC M10-72 Monofacial has a 30 years power warranty; Tongwei TWMNF-66HD725 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Tongwei TNC M10-72 Monofacial and Tongwei TWMNF-66HD725 bifacial panels?
Tongwei TWMNF-66HD725 is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Tongwei TNC M10-72 Monofacial is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 58 Tongwei offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.