TN Solar TN5-54H-390 vs TN Solar SE6-66HBD-715
VS
The verdict
SE6-66HBD-715 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 3.05 pp more efficient. 5 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 14 differencesHow alike are they
5
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
14 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
TN5-54H-390
SE6-66HBD-715
Difference
Module efficiency
19.97 %
23.02 %
3.05 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
0.040 %/°C better in heat
Rated power
390 Wp
715 Wp
325 W more power
Power density
199.7 Wp/m²
230.2 Wp/m²
30.5 Wp/m² higher
Weight
21.0 kg
38.7 kg
17.7 kg lighter
Open-circuit voltage
38.92 V
50.59 V
11.67 V apart
Short-circuit current
12.43 A
17.61 A
5.18 A apart
Module area
1.953 m²
3.106 m²
1.154 m² apart
Cell technology
TOPCon
HJT
TOPCon vs HJT
Voltage at max power
32.56 V
42.54 V
9.98 V apart
Current at max power
11.98 A
16.81 A
4.83 A apart
Cell count
108
132
24 cells apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
Dimensions
1722x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x35 mm
1722x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
TN5-54H-390
13,085 kWh
SE6-66HBD-715
24,064 kWh
Lifetime gap
10,979 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
TN5-54H-390
SE6-66HBD-715
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
390 W
715 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.5% of rated power
372 W
687 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.0% of rated power
355 W
659 W
Hot roof
70 °C
86.5% of rated power
337 W
631 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
TN5-54H-390
SE6-66HBD-715
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
390 Wp
715 Wp
+325 W for SE6-66HBD-715
Module efficiency
19.97 %
23.02 %
+3.05 pp for SE6-66HBD-715
Power density
199.7 Wp/m²
230.2 Wp/m²
+30.5 Wp/m² for SE6-66HBD-715
Open-circuit voltage
38.92 V
50.59 V
11.67 V apart
Voltage at max power
32.56 V
42.54 V
9.98 V apart
Short-circuit current
12.43 A
17.61 A
5.18 A apart
Current at max power
11.98 A
16.81 A
4.83 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
+0.040 %/°C for SE6-66HBD-715
Mechanical
Dimensions
1722x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x35 mm
1722x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
Module area
1.953 m²
3.106 m²
1.154 m² apart
Weight
21.0 kg
38.7 kg
-17.7 kg for TN5-54H-390
Weight per kWp
53.8 kg/kWp
54.1 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
25 yrs
25 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.38 %/yr
Effectively the same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
HJT
TOPCon vs HJT
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
108
132
24 cells apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#12,302
vs
#1,797
SE6-66HBD-715 leads by 10,505 places
Power density
#12,255
vs
#2,018
SE6-66HBD-715 leads by 10,237 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093
vs
#511
SE6-66HBD-715 leads by 5,582 places
Weight
#7,897
vs
#8,339
TN5-54H-390 leads by 442 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#10,672
vs
#112
SE6-66HBD-715 leads by 10,560 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
TN Solar
TN Solar TN5-54H-390 vs TN Solar TN5-54H-385
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
TN Solar
TN Solar TN5-54H-390 vs TN Solar TN5-54H-380
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
TN Solar
TN Solar TN5-54H-390 vs TN Solar TN5-54H-375
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
TN Solar
TN Solar TN5-54H-390 vs TN Solar TN5-54H-370
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
TN Solar
TN Solar SE6-66HBD-715 vs TN Solar SE6-66HBD-710
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
TN Solar
TN Solar SE6-66HBD-715 vs TN Solar SE6-66HBD-705
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: TN Solar TN5-54H-390 or TN Solar SE6-66HBD-715?
According to our database: TN Solar SE6-66HBD-715 has higher module efficiency (23.02% vs 19.97%); TN Solar SE6-66HBD-715 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.300%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of TN Solar TN5-54H-390 and TN Solar SE6-66HBD-715?
TN Solar TN5-54H-390 has a module efficiency of 19.97%, while TN Solar SE6-66HBD-715 is 23.02%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does TN Solar TN5-54H-390 use vs TN Solar SE6-66HBD-715?
TN Solar TN5-54H-390 uses TOPCon cells; TN Solar SE6-66HBD-715 uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on TN Solar TN5-54H-390 and TN Solar SE6-66HBD-715?
TN Solar TN5-54H-390 has a 30 years power warranty; TN Solar SE6-66HBD-715 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are TN Solar TN5-54H-390 and TN Solar SE6-66HBD-715 bifacial panels?
TN Solar SE6-66HBD-715 is bifacial (captures light from both faces); TN Solar TN5-54H-390 is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.