TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725 vs TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA465
VS
The verdict
BD54-WA465 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is rated power: 260 W more power. 4 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 15 differencesHow alike are they
4
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
15 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
ND66-GK725
BD54-WA465
Difference
Rated power
725 Wp
465 Wp
260 W more power
Weight
38.2 kg
21.5 kg
16.7 kg lighter
Product warranty
15 yrs
25 yrs
10 yrs longer
Temperature coefficient
-0.280 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
0.020 %/°C better in heat
Weight per kWp
52.7 kg/kWp
46.2 kg/kWp
6.5 kg/kWp lighter
Open-circuit voltage
49.36 V
41.12 V
8.24 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.60 A
14.29 A
4.31 A apart
Module area
3.106 m²
1.992 m²
1.114 m² apart
Cell technology
N-type
Back Contact
N-type vs Back Contact
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.35 %/yr
0.05 %/yr slower
Voltage at max power
41.27 V
34.68 V
6.59 V apart
Current at max power
17.57 A
13.41 A
4.16 A apart
Cell count
132
108
24 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
1757x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm vs 1757x1134x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
ND66-GK725
24,325 kWh
BD54-WA465
15,723 kWh
Lifetime gap
8,602 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
ND66-GK725
BD54-WA465
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
725 W
465 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.8% of rated power
695 W
447 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.6% of rated power
664 W
429 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.4% of rated power
634 W
411 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
ND66-GK725
BD54-WA465
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
725 Wp
465 Wp
+260 W for ND66-GK725
Module efficiency
23.30 %
23.30 %
Same
Power density
233.4 Wp/m²
233.4 Wp/m²
Same
Open-circuit voltage
49.36 V
41.12 V
8.24 V apart
Voltage at max power
41.27 V
34.68 V
6.59 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.60 A
14.29 A
4.31 A apart
Current at max power
17.57 A
13.41 A
4.16 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.280 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
+0.020 %/°C for BD54-WA465
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
1757x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm vs 1757x1134x30 mm
Module area
3.106 m²
1.992 m²
1.114 m² apart
Weight
38.2 kg
21.5 kg
-16.7 kg for BD54-WA465
Weight per kWp
52.7 kg/kWp
46.2 kg/kWp
-6.5 kg/kWp for BD54-WA465
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
25 yrs
+10 yrs for BD54-WA465
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.35 %/yr
-0.05 %/yr for BD54-WA465
Technology
Cell technology
N-type
Back Contact
N-type vs Back Contact
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
108
24 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,017
vs
#1,017
Tied - the same position in the database
Power density
#936
vs
#989
ND66-GK725 leads by 53 places
Heat behaviour
#1,309
vs
#511
BD54-WA465 leads by 798 places
Weight
#6,337
vs
#1,079
BD54-WA465 leads by 5,258 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#266
vs
#4,646
ND66-GK725 leads by 4,380 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
TCL Zhonghuan
TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725 vs TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK720
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
TCL Zhonghuan
TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725 vs TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK715
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
TCL Zhonghuan
TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725 vs TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK710
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
TCL Zhonghuan
TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725 vs TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK705
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
TCL Zhonghuan
TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725 vs TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK700
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
TCL Zhonghuan
TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA465 vs TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA475
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725 or TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA465?
According to our database: TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA465 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.280%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725 and TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA465?
TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725 has a module efficiency of 23.30%, while TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA465 is 23.30%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725 use vs TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA465?
TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725 uses N-type cells; TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA465 uses Back Contact. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725 and TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA465?
TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725 has a 30 years power warranty; TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA465 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725 and TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA465 bifacial panels?
TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725 is bifacial (captures light from both faces); TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA465 is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 25 TCL Zhonghuan offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.