Skip to main content
ND66-GK725 vs BD54-WA465 4 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725 vs TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA465

TCL Zhonghuan
HSM-ND66-GK725
725 Wp 23.30 % N-type Bifacial
VS
TCL Zhonghuan
HSM-BD54-WA465
465 Wp 23.30 % Back Contact
The verdict

BD54-WA465 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 260 W more power. 4 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 15 differences
How alike are they
4 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

15 of 19 parameters
Parameter ND66-GK725 BD54-WA465 Difference
Rated power 725 Wp 465 Wp 260 W more power
Weight 38.2 kg 21.5 kg 16.7 kg lighter
Product warranty 15 yrs 25 yrs 10 yrs longer
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.260 %/°C 0.020 %/°C better in heat
Weight per kWp 52.7 kg/kWp 46.2 kg/kWp 6.5 kg/kWp lighter
Open-circuit voltage 49.36 V 41.12 V 8.24 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.60 A 14.29 A 4.31 A apart
Module area 3.106 m² 1.992 m² 1.114 m² apart
Cell technology N-type Back Contact N-type vs Back Contact
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.35 %/yr 0.05 %/yr slower
Voltage at max power 41.27 V 34.68 V 6.59 V apart
Current at max power 17.57 A 13.41 A 4.16 A apart
Cell count 132 108 24 cells apart
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 1757x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 1757x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
ND66-GK725
24,325 kWh
BD54-WA465
15,723 kWh
Lifetime gap
8,602 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario ND66-GK725 BD54-WA465
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 725 W 465 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.8% of rated power 695 W 447 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.6% of rated power 664 W 429 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.4% of rated power 634 W 411 W
03

Full specification

Parameter ND66-GK725 BD54-WA465 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 725 Wp 465 Wp +260 W for ND66-GK725
Module efficiency 23.30 % 23.30 % Same
Power density 233.4 Wp/m² 233.4 Wp/m² Same
Open-circuit voltage 49.36 V 41.12 V 8.24 V apart
Voltage at max power 41.27 V 34.68 V 6.59 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.60 A 14.29 A 4.31 A apart
Current at max power 17.57 A 13.41 A 4.16 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.260 %/°C +0.020 %/°C for BD54-WA465
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 1757x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 1757x1134x30 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 1.992 m² 1.114 m² apart
Weight 38.2 kg 21.5 kg -16.7 kg for BD54-WA465
Weight per kWp 52.7 kg/kWp 46.2 kg/kWp -6.5 kg/kWp for BD54-WA465
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 25 yrs +10 yrs for BD54-WA465
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.35 %/yr -0.05 %/yr for BD54-WA465
Technology
Cell technology N-type Back Contact N-type vs Back Contact
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 108 24 cells apart
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#1,017 vs #1,017
Tied - the same position in the database
Power density
#936 vs #989
ND66-GK725 leads by 53 places
Heat behaviour
#1,309 vs #511
BD54-WA465 leads by 798 places
Weight
#6,337 vs #1,079
BD54-WA465 leads by 5,258 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#266 vs #4,646
ND66-GK725 leads by 4,380 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
TCL Zhonghuan
TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725 vs TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK720
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
TCL Zhonghuan
TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725 vs TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK715
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
TCL Zhonghuan
TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725 vs TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK710
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
TCL Zhonghuan
TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725 vs TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK705
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
TCL Zhonghuan
TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725 vs TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK700
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
TCL Zhonghuan
TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA465 vs TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA475
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725 or TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA465?
According to our database: TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA465 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.280%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725 and TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA465?
TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725 has a module efficiency of 23.30%, while TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA465 is 23.30%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725 use vs TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA465?
TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725 uses N-type cells; TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA465 uses Back Contact. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725 and TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA465?
TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725 has a 30 years power warranty; TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA465 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725 and TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA465 bifacial panels?
TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725 is bifacial (captures light from both faces); TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA465 is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 25 TCL Zhonghuan offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.