TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA475 vs TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725
VS
The verdict
BD54-WA475 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is rated power: 250 W more power. 2 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 17 differencesHow alike are they
2
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
17 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
BD54-WA475
ND66-GK725
Difference
Rated power
475 Wp
725 Wp
250 W more power
Module efficiency
23.80 %
23.30 %
0.50 pp more efficient
Weight
21.5 kg
38.2 kg
16.7 kg lighter
Product warranty
25 yrs
15 yrs
10 yrs longer
Weight per kWp
45.3 kg/kWp
52.7 kg/kWp
7.4 kg/kWp lighter
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.280 %/°C
0.020 %/°C better in heat
Open-circuit voltage
41.24 V
49.36 V
8.12 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.35 A
18.60 A
4.25 A apart
Module area
1.992 m²
3.106 m²
1.114 m² apart
Power density
238.4 Wp/m²
233.4 Wp/m²
5.0 Wp/m² higher
Cell technology
Back Contact
N-type
Back Contact vs N-type
Annual degradation
0.35 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
0.05 %/yr slower
Voltage at max power
34.80 V
41.27 V
6.47 V apart
Current at max power
13.66 A
17.57 A
3.91 A apart
Cell count
108
132
24 cells apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
Dimensions
1757x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
1757x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
BD54-WA475
16,061 kWh
ND66-GK725
24,325 kWh
Lifetime gap
8,264 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
BD54-WA475
ND66-GK725
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
475 W
725 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.8% of rated power
456 W
695 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.6% of rated power
438 W
664 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.4% of rated power
419 W
634 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
BD54-WA475
ND66-GK725
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
475 Wp
725 Wp
+250 W for ND66-GK725
Module efficiency
23.80 %
23.30 %
+0.50 pp for BD54-WA475
Power density
238.4 Wp/m²
233.4 Wp/m²
+5.0 Wp/m² for BD54-WA475
Open-circuit voltage
41.24 V
49.36 V
8.12 V apart
Voltage at max power
34.80 V
41.27 V
6.47 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.35 A
18.60 A
4.25 A apart
Current at max power
13.66 A
17.57 A
3.91 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.280 %/°C
+0.020 %/°C for BD54-WA475
Mechanical
Dimensions
1757x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
1757x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area
1.992 m²
3.106 m²
1.114 m² apart
Weight
21.5 kg
38.2 kg
-16.7 kg for BD54-WA475
Weight per kWp
45.3 kg/kWp
52.7 kg/kWp
-7.4 kg/kWp for BD54-WA475
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
25 yrs
15 yrs
+10 yrs for BD54-WA475
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.35 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
-0.05 %/yr for BD54-WA475
Technology
Cell technology
Back Contact
N-type
Back Contact vs N-type
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
108
132
24 cells apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#433
vs
#1,017
BD54-WA475 leads by 584 places
Power density
#417
vs
#936
BD54-WA475 leads by 519 places
Heat behaviour
#511
vs
#1,309
BD54-WA475 leads by 798 places
Weight
#669
vs
#6,337
BD54-WA475 leads by 5,668 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3,753
vs
#266
ND66-GK725 leads by 3,487 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
TCL Zhonghuan
TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA475 vs TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA470
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
TCL Zhonghuan
TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA475 vs TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA465
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
TCL Zhonghuan
TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA475 vs TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA460
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
TCL Zhonghuan
TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725 vs TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK720
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
TCL Zhonghuan
TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725 vs TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK715
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
TCL Zhonghuan
TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725 vs TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK710
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA475 or TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725?
According to our database: TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA475 has higher module efficiency (23.80% vs 23.30%); TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA475 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.280%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA475 and TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725?
TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA475 has a module efficiency of 23.80%, while TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725 is 23.30%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA475 use vs TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725?
TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA475 uses Back Contact cells; TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725 uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA475 and TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725?
TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA475 has a 30 years power warranty; TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA475 and TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725 bifacial panels?
TCL Zhonghuan HSM-ND66-GK725 is bifacial (captures light from both faces); TCL Zhonghuan HSM-BD54-WA475 is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 20 TCL Zhonghuan offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.