Tata Power Solar TP530HG10TB vs Tata Power Solar TP637LG10B
VS
The verdict
TP637LG10B leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 2.35 pp more efficient. 4 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 15 differencesHow alike are they
4
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
15 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
TP530HG10TB
TP637LG10B
Difference
Module efficiency
20.52 %
22.87 %
2.35 pp more efficient
Rated power
530 Wp
637 Wp
107 W more power
Power density
205.2 Wp/m²
228.7 Wp/m²
23.5 Wp/m² higher
Performance warranty
25 yrs
30 yrs
5 yrs longer
Weight
29.0 kg
36.0 kg
7.0 kg lighter
Annual degradation
0.72 %/yr
0.60 %/yr
0.12 %/yr slower
Open-circuit voltage
49.30 V
54.88 V
5.58 V apart
Module area
2.583 m²
2.785 m²
0.202 m² apart
Product warranty
10 yrs
12 yrs
2 yrs longer
Temperature coefficient
-0.360 %/°C
-0.370 %/°C
0.010 %/°C better in heat
Voltage at max power
42.20 V
47.16 V
4.96 V apart
Cell count
144
156
12 cells apart
Short-circuit current
13.13 A
13.97 A
0.84 A apart
Dimensions
2278x1134x35 mm
2456x1134x35 mm
2278x1134x35 mm vs 2456x1134x35 mm
Current at max power
12.56 A
13.50 A
0.94 A apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
TP530HG10TB
16,611 kWh
TP637LG10B
20,364 kWh
Lifetime gap
3,753 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
TP530HG10TB
TP637LG10B
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
530 W
637 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.5% of rated power
501 W
602 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
88.9% of rated power
473 W
566 W
Hot roof
70 °C
83.3% of rated power
444 W
531 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
TP530HG10TB
TP637LG10B
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
530 Wp
637 Wp
+107 W for TP637LG10B
Module efficiency
20.52 %
22.87 %
+2.35 pp for TP637LG10B
Power density
205.2 Wp/m²
228.7 Wp/m²
+23.5 Wp/m² for TP637LG10B
Open-circuit voltage
49.30 V
54.88 V
5.58 V apart
Voltage at max power
42.20 V
47.16 V
4.96 V apart
Short-circuit current
13.13 A
13.97 A
0.84 A apart
Current at max power
12.56 A
13.50 A
0.94 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.360 %/°C
-0.370 %/°C
+0.010 %/°C for TP530HG10TB
Mechanical
Dimensions
2278x1134x35 mm
2456x1134x35 mm
2278x1134x35 mm vs 2456x1134x35 mm
Module area
2.583 m²
2.785 m²
0.202 m² apart
Weight
29.0 kg
36.0 kg
-7.0 kg for TP530HG10TB
Weight per kWp
54.7 kg/kWp
56.5 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
10 yrs
12 yrs
+2 yrs for TP637LG10B
Performance warranty
25 yrs
30 yrs
+5 yrs for TP637LG10B
Annual degradation
0.72 %/yr
0.60 %/yr
-0.12 %/yr for TP637LG10B
Technology
Cell technology
PERC
PERC
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
144
156
12 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#11,244
vs
#2,531
TP637LG10B leads by 8,713 places
Power density
#11,255
vs
#2,447
TP637LG10B leads by 8,808 places
Heat behaviour
#12,345
vs
#13,081
TP530HG10TB leads by 736 places
Weight
#9,116
vs
#10,693
TP530HG10TB leads by 1,577 places
Warranty
#9,798
vs
#21
TP637LG10B leads by 9,777 places
Overall
#9,917
vs
#2,188
TP637LG10B leads by 7,729 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Tata Power Solar
Tata Power Solar TP530HG10TB vs Tata Power Solar TP550HG10TB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tata Power Solar
Tata Power Solar TP530HG10TB vs Tata Power Solar TP545HG10TB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tata Power Solar
Tata Power Solar TP530HG10TB vs Tata Power Solar TP540HG10TB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tata Power Solar
Tata Power Solar TP530HG10TB vs Tata Power Solar TP535HG10TB
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Tata Power Solar
Tata Power Solar TP637LG10B vs Tata Power Solar TP642LG10B
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Tata Power Solar
Tata Power Solar TP637LG10B vs Tata Power Solar TP631LG10B
One difference: module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Tata Power Solar TP530HG10TB or Tata Power Solar TP637LG10B?
According to our database: Tata Power Solar TP637LG10B has higher module efficiency (22.87% vs 20.52%); Tata Power Solar TP530HG10TB tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.360%/°C vs -0.370%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Tata Power Solar TP530HG10TB and Tata Power Solar TP637LG10B?
Tata Power Solar TP530HG10TB has a module efficiency of 20.52%, while Tata Power Solar TP637LG10B is 22.87%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Tata Power Solar TP530HG10TB use vs Tata Power Solar TP637LG10B?
Tata Power Solar TP530HG10TB uses PERC cells; Tata Power Solar TP637LG10B uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Tata Power Solar TP530HG10TB and Tata Power Solar TP637LG10B?
Tata Power Solar TP530HG10TB has a 25 years power warranty; Tata Power Solar TP637LG10B has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Tata Power Solar TP530HG10TB and Tata Power Solar TP637LG10B bifacial panels?
Both Tata Power Solar TP530HG10TB and Tata Power Solar TP637LG10B are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.
