Tata Power Solar GSD7S72T-580WT vs Tata Power Solar TP642LG10B
VS
The verdict
GSD7S72T-580WT leads on the differences that matter
The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.070 %/°C better in heat. 6 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 13 differencesHow alike are they
6
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
13 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
GSD7S72T-580WT
TP642LG10B
Difference
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.370 %/°C
0.070 %/°C better in heat
Rated power
580 Wp
642 Wp
62 W more power
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.60 %/yr
0.20 %/yr slower
Module efficiency
22.45 %
23.05 %
0.60 pp more efficient
Weight
32.0 kg
36.0 kg
4.0 kg lighter
Product warranty
25 yrs
12 yrs
13 yrs longer
Module area
2.583 m²
2.785 m²
0.202 m² apart
Power density
224.5 Wp/m²
230.5 Wp/m²
6.0 Wp/m² higher
Open-circuit voltage
51.02 V
55.00 V
3.98 V apart
Cell technology
TOPCon
PERC
TOPCon vs PERC
Voltage at max power
42.37 V
47.28 V
4.91 V apart
Cell count
144
156
12 cells apart
Dimensions
2278x1134x30 mm
2456x1134x35 mm
2278x1134x30 mm vs 2456x1134x35 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Declared annual degradation, with a 1.0% first-year loss assumed for both panels because at least one datasheet omits it, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
GSD7S72T-580WT
19,460 kWh
TP642LG10B
20,870 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,410 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
GSD7S72T-580WT
TP642LG10B
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
580 W
642 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.5% of rated power
554 W
606 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
88.9% of rated power
528 W
571 W
Hot roof
70 °C
83.3% of rated power
502 W
535 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
GSD7S72T-580WT
TP642LG10B
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
580 Wp
642 Wp
+62 W for TP642LG10B
Module efficiency
22.45 %
23.05 %
+0.60 pp for TP642LG10B
Power density
224.5 Wp/m²
230.5 Wp/m²
+6.0 Wp/m² for TP642LG10B
Open-circuit voltage
51.02 V
55.00 V
3.98 V apart
Voltage at max power
42.37 V
47.28 V
4.91 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.47 A
14.01 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
13.69 A
13.58 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.370 %/°C
+0.070 %/°C for GSD7S72T-580WT
Mechanical
Dimensions
2278x1134x30 mm
2456x1134x35 mm
2278x1134x30 mm vs 2456x1134x35 mm
Module area
2.583 m²
2.785 m²
0.202 m² apart
Weight
32.0 kg
36.0 kg
-4.0 kg for GSD7S72T-580WT
Weight per kWp
55.2 kg/kWp
56.1 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
25 yrs
12 yrs
+13 yrs for GSD7S72T-580WT
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.60 %/yr
-0.20 %/yr for GSD7S72T-580WT
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
PERC
TOPCon vs PERC
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
144
156
12 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#4,620
vs
#1,700
TP642LG10B leads by 2,920 places
Power density
#4,547
vs
#1,701
TP642LG10B leads by 2,846 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093
vs
#13,081
GSD7S72T-580WT leads by 6,988 places
Weight
#9,588
vs
#10,369
GSD7S72T-580WT leads by 781 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#2,039
vs
#1,920
TP642LG10B leads by 119 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Tata Power Solar
Tata Power Solar GSD7S72T-580WT vs Tata Power Solar GSD7S72T-595WT
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tata Power Solar
Tata Power Solar GSD7S72T-580WT vs Tata Power Solar GSD7S72T-590WT
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tata Power Solar
Tata Power Solar GSD7S72T-580WT vs Tata Power Solar GSD7S72T-585WT
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tata Power Solar
Tata Power Solar GSD7S72T-580WT vs Tata Power Solar GSD7S72T-575WT
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Tata Power Solar
Tata Power Solar GSD7S72T-580WT vs Tata Power Solar GSD7S72T-570WT
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tata Power Solar
Tata Power Solar GSD7S72T-580WT vs Tata Power Solar GSD7S72T-565WT
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Tata Power Solar GSD7S72T-580WT or Tata Power Solar TP642LG10B?
According to our database: Tata Power Solar TP642LG10B has higher module efficiency (23.05% vs 22.45%); Tata Power Solar GSD7S72T-580WT tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.300%/°C vs -0.370%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Tata Power Solar GSD7S72T-580WT and Tata Power Solar TP642LG10B?
Tata Power Solar GSD7S72T-580WT has a module efficiency of 22.45%, while Tata Power Solar TP642LG10B is 23.05%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Tata Power Solar GSD7S72T-580WT use vs Tata Power Solar TP642LG10B?
Tata Power Solar GSD7S72T-580WT uses TOPCon cells; Tata Power Solar TP642LG10B uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Tata Power Solar GSD7S72T-580WT and Tata Power Solar TP642LG10B?
Tata Power Solar GSD7S72T-580WT has a 30 years power warranty; Tata Power Solar TP642LG10B has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Tata Power Solar GSD7S72T-580WT and Tata Power Solar TP642LG10B bifacial panels?
Both Tata Power Solar GSD7S72T-580WT and Tata Power Solar TP642LG10B are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.
