Skip to main content
STP730S-D66-Nsh+ vs STP505S-H54-Nfb+ 5 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Suntech STP730S-D66-Nsh+ vs Suntech STP505S-H54-Nfb+

Suntech STP730S-D66-Nsh+
STP730S-D66-Nsh+
730 Wp 23.50 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
Suntech STP505S-H54-Nfb+
STP505S-H54-Nfb+
505 Wp 22.70 % TOPCon
The verdict

14 differences, and they point both ways

The largest is module efficiency: 0.80 pp more efficient. 5 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 14 differences
How alike are they
5 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

14 of 19 parameters
Parameter STP730S-D66-Nsh+ STP505S-H54-Nfb+ Difference
Module efficiency 23.50 % 22.70 % 0.80 pp more efficient
Rated power 730 Wp 505 Wp 225 W more power
Weight 37.5 kg 23.5 kg 14.0 kg lighter
Product warranty 15 yrs 25 yrs 10 yrs longer
Power density 235.0 Wp/m² 227.1 Wp/m² 7.9 Wp/m² higher
Open-circuit voltage 49.66 V 40.55 V 9.11 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.54 A 15.68 A 2.86 A apart
Module area 3.106 m² 2.224 m² 0.883 m² apart
Weight per kWp 51.4 kg/kWp 46.5 kg/kWp 4.8 kg/kWp lighter
Voltage at max power 41.27 V 34.17 V 7.10 V apart
Current at max power 17.70 A 14.78 A 2.92 A apart
Cell count 132 108 24 cells apart
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 1961x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 1961x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.280 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
STP730S-D66-Nsh+
24,493 kWh
STP505S-H54-Nfb+
16,944 kWh
Lifetime gap
7,549 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario STP730S-D66-Nsh+ STP505S-H54-Nfb+
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 730 W 505 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.8% of rated power 699 W 484 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.6% of rated power 669 W 463 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.4% of rated power 638 W 441 W
03

Full specification

Parameter STP730S-D66-Nsh+ STP505S-H54-Nfb+ Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 730 Wp 505 Wp +225 W for STP730S-D66-Nsh+
Module efficiency 23.50 % 22.70 % +0.80 pp for STP730S-D66-Nsh+
Power density 235.0 Wp/m² 227.1 Wp/m² +7.9 Wp/m² for STP730S-D66-Nsh+
Open-circuit voltage 49.66 V 40.55 V 9.11 V apart
Voltage at max power 41.27 V 34.17 V 7.10 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.54 A 15.68 A 2.86 A apart
Current at max power 17.70 A 14.78 A 2.92 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.280 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 1961x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 1961x1134x30 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 2.224 m² 0.883 m² apart
Weight 37.5 kg 23.5 kg -14.0 kg for STP505S-H54-Nfb+
Weight per kWp 51.4 kg/kWp 46.5 kg/kWp -4.8 kg/kWp for STP505S-H54-Nfb+
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 25 yrs +10 yrs for STP505S-H54-Nfb+
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 108 24 cells apart
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#716 vs #3,307
STP730S-D66-Nsh+ leads by 2,591 places
Power density
#800 vs #3,312
STP730S-D66-Nsh+ leads by 2,512 places
Heat behaviour
#1,309 vs #1,309
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#4,748 vs #1,199
STP505S-H54-Nfb+ leads by 3,549 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#196 vs #4,015
STP730S-D66-Nsh+ leads by 3,819 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Suntech STP730S-D66-Nsh+ vs Suntech STP735S-D66-Nsh+
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Suntech STP730S-D66-Nsh+ vs Suntech STP725S-D66-Nsh+
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Suntech STP730S-D66-Nsh+ vs Suntech STP720S-D66-Nsh+
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Suntech STP730S-D66-Nsh+ vs Suntech STP715S-D66-Nsh+
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Suntech STP730S-D66-Nsh+ vs Suntech STP710S-D66-Nsh+
7 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Suntech STP730S-D66-Nsh+ vs Suntech STP705S-D66-Nsh+
8 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Suntech STP730S-D66-Nsh+ or Suntech STP505S-H54-Nfb+?
According to our database: Suntech STP730S-D66-Nsh+ has higher module efficiency (23.50% vs 22.70%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Suntech STP730S-D66-Nsh+ and Suntech STP505S-H54-Nfb+?
Suntech STP730S-D66-Nsh+ has a module efficiency of 23.50%, while Suntech STP505S-H54-Nfb+ is 22.70%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Suntech STP730S-D66-Nsh+ use vs Suntech STP505S-H54-Nfb+?
Suntech STP730S-D66-Nsh+ uses TOPCon cells; Suntech STP505S-H54-Nfb+ uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Suntech STP730S-D66-Nsh+ and Suntech STP505S-H54-Nfb+?
Suntech STP730S-D66-Nsh+ has a 30 years power warranty; Suntech STP505S-H54-Nfb+ has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Suntech STP730S-D66-Nsh+ and Suntech STP505S-H54-Nfb+ bifacial panels?
Suntech STP730S-D66-Nsh+ is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Suntech STP505S-H54-Nfb+ is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 30 Suntech offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.